![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mitty wrote: If you are getting vectors, he may not have the vector though. The previous controller is required to coordinate that. I don't believe that the automated handoff has any facility for passing the vector information, although part of the data tag in a handoff (from Center to a TRACON for example) can indicate the runway that the flight is being vectored for. The center has no control over my data tag. The center does not vector to a runway, that is an approach controls job. Another interesting thing I learned was that the TRACON radar doesn't show the little vector that indicates direction of flight like the Center radars do. That's because center controllers are retarded and wouldn't know which way the little airplanes are moving if the computer doesn't tell them. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Newps" wrote in message . ..
Mitty wrote: Another interesting thing I learned was that the TRACON radar doesn't show the little vector that indicates direction of flight like the Center radars do. That's because center controllers are retarded and wouldn't know which way the little airplanes are moving if the computer doesn't tell them. ROTFL! Good zinger, Newps. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 3/26/2007 9:28 PM, Newps wrote the following: Mitty wrote: If you are getting vectors, he may not have the vector though. The previous controller is required to coordinate that. My experience is limited to sitting with MSP and ZMP controllers but I am sure I saw cases where the handoff was automated and there was no talk on the telephone. Possibly these are standardized routes where everyone knows what the vector is. Or is there a way this info would have been coded into the data tag & I just didn't notice? I don't believe that the automated handoff has any facility for passing the vector information, although part of the data tag in a handoff (from Center to a TRACON for example) can indicate the runway that the flight is being vectored for. The center has no control over my data tag. The center does not vector to a runway, that is an approach controls job. Possibly it is different at MSP. When I was sitting at the north arrivals position the data tags on the targets coming from Center were already marked for the runway. "V3R" or something like that, indicating that the flight was headed to 30 right. Possibly there is an LOA where Center picks the runway/approach gate based on the direction the flight is coming from, then adds the tag. But it was definitely there when the target began to flash, before Approach took the handoff. Another interesting thing I learned was that the TRACON radar doesn't show the little vector that indicates direction of flight like the Center radars do. That's because center controllers are retarded and wouldn't know which way the little airplanes are moving if the computer doesn't tell them. So, you work at a TRACON, right? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mitty wrote: On 3/26/2007 9:28 PM, Newps wrote the following: Mitty wrote: If you are getting vectors, he may not have the vector though. The previous controller is required to coordinate that. My experience is limited to sitting with MSP and ZMP controllers but I am sure I saw cases where the handoff was automated and there was no talk on the telephone. Possibly these are standardized routes where everyone knows what the vector is. Or is there a way this info would have been coded into the data tag & I just didn't notice? The center controller has no control over an approach controllers data tag. Completely different systems. Many times a controller is only required to send a plane thru a gate. Any heading that gets the plane thru the opening is good and doesn't have to be coordinated. So, you work at a TRACON, right? Yessir. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 3/27/2007 2:06 PM, Newps wrote the following: Mitty wrote: On 3/26/2007 9:28 PM, Newps wrote the following: Mitty wrote: If you are getting vectors, he may not have the vector though. The previous controller is required to coordinate that. My experience is limited to sitting with MSP and ZMP controllers but I am sure I saw cases where the handoff was automated and there was no talk on the telephone. Possibly these are standardized routes where everyone knows what the vector is. Or is there a way this info would have been coded into the data tag & I just didn't notice? The center controller has no control over an approach controllers data tag. Completely different systems. Many times a controller is only required to send a plane thru a gate. Any heading that gets the plane thru the opening is good and doesn't have to be coordinated. Hmmm ... possibly the handoff with the runway data in the tag was coming from a high altitude TRACON sector then. I assumed it was coming from Center because the aircraft were on the edge of the 'scope, beyond the 30 mile ring. But the runway tag was definitely there before the north arrivals sector clicked to accept the handoff. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Big Debts are costing troops their Security clearances | Tiger | Naval Aviation | 8 | October 28th 06 01:53 AM |
Obtaining IFR clearances in Canada | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 22nd 04 03:47 PM |
Question: civilian contractors and security clearances | Charlie Wolf | Naval Aviation | 5 | July 6th 04 03:54 AM |
Clearances for Practice | Jerry Kaidor | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | March 28th 04 07:00 PM |
Where is approach good about multiple approaches and clearances in the air? | Andrew Gideon | Instrument Flight Rules | 29 | February 14th 04 02:51 AM |