First impressions of flight

I couldn't find the "pause" button.

The frame rate was really good, and all the autogen was turned on.

I also liked the multi-screen 3-d effect, and the true-motion... :-)

Peter Dohm wrote:
I couldn't find the "pause" button.
The frame rate was really good, and all the autogen was turned on.

I also liked the multi-screen 3-d effect, and the true-motion... :-)

Had to admire the cloud draw distance, too.

TheSmokingGnu

On Mar 29, 11:16 am, "Peter Dohm" wrote:
I couldn't find the "pause" button.

The frame rate was really good, and all the autogen was turned on.

I also liked the multi-screen 3-d effect, and the true-motion... :-)

I heard from a PC salesman that a pilot spent more than RM18,000 for
PC and peripherals,
just to be able to play MSFS. This price is more than of the RM30,000
required to get PPL
on a cesna 172P at our local flying club.

Perhaps he is so addicted to the multi-scren 3-d effect and true
motion that he had to get similar effects all the time.

I also heard from him that these people who play MSFS are also Boeing
737 commercial pilots. The salesman guessed that probably the pilots
would like to experience aerobatic flights, such as flying inverted
which will not be allowed on real commercial planes.

Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad writes:

I heard from a PC salesman that a pilot spent more than RM18,000 for
PC and peripherals, just to be able to play MSFS. This price is more
than of the RM30,000 required to get PPL on a cesna 172P at our local
flying club.

But on a continuing basis, it's cheaper, since once he has the setup, he can
fly the sim for free. In contrast, every hour spent in a real aircraft costs
money. In fact, everything about real aviation costs a fortune. A fancy
computer provides more bang for the buck.

Perhaps he is so addicted to the multi-scren 3-d effect and true
motion that he had to get similar effects all the time.

It was probably the more economical of two options. He could fly for an hour
a month in a real aircraft, or fly for several hours a day in a simulated
aircraft.

I also heard from him that these people who play MSFS are also Boeing
737 commercial pilots. The salesman guessed that probably the pilots
would like to experience aerobatic flights, such as flying inverted
which will not be allowed on real commercial planes.

Or they may simply want to fly their own 737s, which would never be possible
in real life.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad writes:

I heard from a PC salesman that a pilot spent more than RM18,000 for
PC and peripherals, just to be able to play MSFS. This price is more
than of the RM30,000 required to get PPL on a cesna 172P at our local
flying club.

But on a continuing basis, it's cheaper, since once he has the setup,
he can fly the sim for free.

You can't fly a sim, moron.


Bertie

Bertie the Bunyip writes:

You can't fly a sim, moron.

You just haven't tried a really good simulator.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip writes:

You can't fly a sim, moron.

You just haven't tried a really good simulator.


Bwawhahwhahwhahhwhahwhahwhahwhhahwhahwhahhwhahwhah whahwhhahwhahwhahwhhah
whahwhahwhhahwhahwhahhwhahwhahwhha!

Well, the one I use cost more than the national debt of many countries.
It costs more than th eBoeing it represents, IIRC. It's certified for
zero time training, and has a state of the art visuals.

And it's still just a box of tricks.

Oh, and by the way, it's common knowledge amongst pilots, that guys who
can handle th esim well are usually **** in the ariplane and vice versa.



Bertie

Bertie the Bunyip writes:

Well, the one I use cost more than the national debt of many countries.
It costs more than th eBoeing it represents, IIRC. It's certified for
zero time training, and has a state of the art visuals.

Costs more than the Boeing it represents? I don't think so. A typical
full-motion simulator of that type would go for perhaps $30 million, whereas
something like a 737 starts at around $135 million new.

Oh, and by the way, it's common knowledge amongst pilots, that guys who
can handle th esim well are usually **** in the ariplane and vice versa.

Pilots spend a lot of time blowing smoke and tilting mirrors, too.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

In article ,
says...
Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad writes:

I heard from a PC salesman that a pilot spent more than RM18,000 for
PC and peripherals, just to be able to play MSFS. This price is more
than of the RM30,000 required to get PPL on a cesna 172P at our local
flying club.

But on a continuing basis, it's cheaper, since once he has the setup, he can
fly the sim for free. In contrast, every hour spent in a real aircraft costs
money. In fact, everything about real aviation costs a fortune. A fancy
computer provides more bang for the buck.

Perhaps he is so addicted to the multi-scren 3-d effect and true
motion that he had to get similar effects all the time.

It was probably the more economical of two options. He could fly for an hour
a month in a real aircraft, or fly for several hours a day in a simulated
aircraft.

I also heard from him that these people who play MSFS are also Boeing
737 commercial pilots. The salesman guessed that probably the pilots
would like to experience aerobatic flights, such as flying inverted
which will not be allowed on real commercial planes.

Or they may simply want to fly their own 737s, which would never be possible
in real life.

Real life? You do know what "simulator" means don't you? Don't answer
that, please.

--
Duncan

Dave Doe writes:

Real life? You do know what "simulator" means don't you?

In a good simulation, you forget that it's simulation until it's over.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.