![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Halliwell wrote:
:In article , Fred J. McCall writes : Now, the mechanical rate shouldn't come :as a surprise to anyone with two neurons to rub together, given that :the AV-8 is older technology, more mechanically complex to begin with, :and only has a single engine so any engine failure pretty much toasts :you. : :VSTOL JSF has only one engine and is even more mechanically complex. Yeah. I know. The claim is that reliability has improved so much over the past decades that it is now perfectly reasonable to adopt Naval aircraft with single engines. Needless to say, I'm not convinced. I'm even less convinced about that whole lift-fan drive train for the -C version. It may make transitions and hover easier - but only up until the first non-perfect moment of the hardware has. It strikes me as a smoking hole waiting to happen. But then, I don't design airplanes and I'll never have to fly in the thing.... -- "Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute." -- Charles Pinckney |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Fred J. McCall
writes Yeah. I know. The claim is that reliability has improved so much over the past decades that it is now perfectly reasonable to adopt Naval aircraft with single engines. The single engine obviously makes the loss of the aircraft more likely, especially in naval ops where you're basically limited to vertical landing. The real problem is engine failure in the hover, where the pilot has very little time to react and has no option to save the aircraft (makes his decision a bit easier, his only option is to pull the handle). The attitude with the Harrier seems to be, if the engine stops, your trained military pilot pulls the handle and wins a Martin Baker tie. With multi-engined VSTOL, losing an engine in the hover usually has the same result, except the aircraft may not fall in a stable fashion, making escape harder. If you cross-connect two engines like the V-22, you always need twice the power you actually need. With a tilt-rotor, the last place you want big engines is on the end of the wings, especially if you're trying to tilt the whole mass of the engine. Better to put the engines in the middle and take the drive to the props. VSTOL JSF has the worst of both worlds, a single engine and two lift mechanisms. -- John |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Osprey 2 modifications | Terry Mortimore | Home Built | 5 | October 23rd 04 11:46 PM |
Amphib: Coot vs Osprey II | Greg Milligan | Home Built | 9 | December 29th 03 01:48 AM |