![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Sammy writes: The issue we were debating was indeed whether or not the scenario was silly. No, we were debating whether or not it's possible. And it is possible. Assessments of silliness are subjective and have no place here. If this were considered a significant risk by the risk management experts of the world, we'd have a standing procedure on what happens if both pilots are incapacitated just as we have procedures for water landings etc. I'm not about to ignore the experts and listen to you. The absence of a procedure doesn't mean that a given procedure won't work. How's it better if a non certified ILS ploughs you into the ground. It is unlikely to do that. However even then you'd be wrong because chances are almost 100% it wouldn't be calibrated well enough. How great would the error be, exactly? Yes again, the experts are wrong and you're right. No, they simply assume that the A380 will be a reality soon, whereas I do not. Ahhhhhh so now you are going to change that set in stone FMC programming are you? The FMC is not programmed for a notorious approach to begin with. FMCs aren't programmed for approaches period, you moron Bertie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
FMCs aren't programmed for approaches period, you moron Bertie Well yes they are. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flydive wrote in :
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: FMCs aren't programmed for approaches period, you moron Bertie Well yes they are. Uh, no they're not. Only sids and stars, unless you mean an RNAV app. Airplane still uses the navaids intended for the appp. Bertie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Flydive wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: FMCs aren't programmed for approaches period, you moron Bertie Well yes they are. Uh, no they're not. Only sids and stars, unless you mean an RNAV app. Airplane still uses the navaids intended for the appp. Bertie Or NDB, VOR, GPS.......(and both laterally and vertically) Of course ILS are still flown using navaids, but all others no. And above it was not specified you were talking only about ILS |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flydive wrote in :
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Flydive wrote in news:460e0a56$1_5 @news.bluewin.ch: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: FMCs aren't programmed for approaches period, you moron Bertie Well yes they are. Uh, no they're not. Only sids and stars, unless you mean an RNAV app. Airplane still uses the navaids intended for the appp. Bertie Or NDB, VOR, GPS.......(and both laterally and vertically) Of course ILS are still flown using navaids, but all others no. And above it was not specified you were talking only about ILS But fjukktard was talking about an airplane making an approach and landing all unaided. Unless your outfit allows autolands off an ADF..... Bertie |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Flydive wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Flydive wrote in news:460e0a56$1_5 @news.bluewin.ch: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: FMCs aren't programmed for approaches period, you moron Bertie Well yes they are. Uh, no they're not. Only sids and stars, unless you mean an RNAV app. Airplane still uses the navaids intended for the appp. Bertie Or NDB, VOR, GPS.......(and both laterally and vertically) Of course ILS are still flown using navaids, but all others no. And above it was not specified you were talking only about ILS But fjukktard was talking about an airplane making an approach and landing all unaided. Unless your outfit allows autolands off an ADF..... Bertie Well, as I said it can follow the appch laterally and vertically down to the runway, the landing is not going to be pretty for sure, more a crash landing and would not like to be on it for sure. And as I said in the other post the FMS can tune to the ILS and do the appch using the navaids, again not a pretty landing but probably survivable. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flydive wrote in :
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Flydive wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Flydive wrote in news:460e0a56$1_5 @news.bluewin.ch: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: FMCs aren't programmed for approaches period, you moron Bertie Well yes they are. Uh, no they're not. Only sids and stars, unless you mean an RNAV app. Airplane still uses the navaids intended for the appp. Bertie Or NDB, VOR, GPS.......(and both laterally and vertically) Of course ILS are still flown using navaids, but all others no. And above it was not specified you were talking only about ILS But fjukktard was talking about an airplane making an approach and landing all unaided. Unless your outfit allows autolands off an ADF..... Bertie Well, as I said it can follow the appch laterally and vertically down to the runway, the landing is not going to be pretty for sure, more a crash landing and would not like to be on it for sure. Well, they can all do that. in fact you could do it with even older stuff. I know someone who did onc e, in fact. Case of having to. But what **** for brains is talking about is pure holywood crap. And as I said in the other post the FMS can tune to the ILS and do the appch using the navaids, again not a pretty landing but probably survivable. And what airplane, exactly, are you talking about that can do this? Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Off-topic, but in need of help | dennis | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 4th 07 10:40 PM |
Almost on topic... | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 22 | January 30th 06 06:55 PM |
off topic, just a little--maybe? | L.D. | Home Built | 5 | August 27th 05 04:56 PM |
off topic | Randall Robertson | Simulators | 0 | January 2nd 04 01:29 PM |