![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But to say that all class D's shouldn't have
a tower is ridiculous. To make places like Van Nuys, Pontiac, even where I used to work, Grand Forks, ND; uncontrolled fields would make it far more dangerous and tremendously inefficient. People fly to North Dakota? ducking! I submit that if these airports are busy enough to need a control tower, than they should merit radar. (I know some already have it, but most do not.) This weird mish-mash of some Class D's with, and some without radar, makes for a pretty bizarre set of circumstances for pilots. Personally I find it just a bit odd, and a little uncomfortable, not knowing if I'm being controlled by Mr. Magoo with binoculars, or George Jetson with radar. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: I submit that if these airports are busy enough to need a control tower, than they should merit radar. (I know some already have it, but most do not.) Getting radar coverage for every control tower would be quite expensive. This weird mish-mash of some Class D's with, and some without radar, makes for a pretty bizarre set of circumstances for pilots. Personally I find it just a bit odd, and a little uncomfortable, not knowing if I'm being controlled by Mr. Magoo with binoculars, or George Jetson with radar. Prior to 9/11, I would occasionally visit the tower at KBED on quiet mornings (usually Sunday). They have a feed from the ASR-9 at Boston and optionally the ASR at MHT. These radars are blinds below around 600 feet at the airport and traffic to the southwest of KBED has to be up around 2000 feet to be reliably visible on radar. Anyway, the controllers were clear that their job was to visually seperate traffic and didn't like the controllers that stared at the DBRITE instead of looking out the window. -- Bob Noel (gave up looking for a particular sig the lawyer will hate) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyway, the controllers were clear that their job
was to visually seperate traffic and didn't like the controllers that stared at the DBRITE instead of looking out the window. Wooo boy. I used to work with guys like that, back in the '80s. They didn't trust us kids who were looking at a computer screen, instead of writing the newspaper draws on clear plastic sheets with a grease pencil. After all, it had worked for them for 50 years.... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay Honeck wrote: Anyway, the controllers were clear that their job was to visually seperate traffic and didn't like the controllers that stared at the DBRITE instead of looking out the window. Wooo boy. I used to work with guys like that, back in the '80s. They didn't trust us kids who were looking at a computer screen, instead of writing the newspaper draws on clear plastic sheets with a grease pencil. After all, it had worked for them for 50 years.... You don't understand the limitations of radar. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: Anyway, the controllers were clear that their job was to visually seperate traffic and didn't like the controllers that stared at the DBRITE instead of looking out the window. Wooo boy. I used to work with guys like that, back in the '80s. They didn't trust us kids who were looking at a computer screen, instead of writing the newspaper draws on clear plastic sheets with a grease pencil. After all, it had worked for them for 50 years.... Well, at KBED looking at the DBRITE isn't all that useful given the radar coverage, especially to the southwest. btw - these controllers were all years younger than we are, hardly old farts set in their ways (I know, I know, I'm repeating myself). -- Bob Noel (gave up looking for a particular sig the lawyer will hate) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay Honeck wrote: But to say that all class D's shouldn't have a tower is ridiculous. To make places like Van Nuys, Pontiac, even where I used to work, Grand Forks, ND; uncontrolled fields would make it far more dangerous and tremendously inefficient. People fly to North Dakota? ducking! I submit that if these airports are busy enough to need a control tower, than they should merit radar. (I know some already have it, but most do not.) Radar can help but but is too coarse for a busy class D. Nothing will beat a good pair of eyes and good judgement. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Round Engines | john smith | Piloting | 20 | February 15th 07 03:31 AM |
induced airflow | buttman | Piloting | 3 | February 19th 06 04:36 AM |
Round Engines | Voxpopuli | Naval Aviation | 16 | May 31st 05 06:48 PM |
Source of Induced Drag | Ken Kochanski | Soaring | 2 | January 10th 04 12:18 AM |
Predicting ground effects on induced power | Marc Shorten | Soaring | 0 | October 28th 03 11:18 AM |