![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... That is what happens. Doubtful. Because no one has ever claimed there was. Because there are no incident or accident reports. That wouldn't mean there haven't been any, that would just mean nobody's reported any. And you can't even be sure nobody's reported any. Not knowing they are voluntary is totally irrelevant and hardly a problem. I've already explained the relevance and how it can be a problem. Review the thread. Any pilot that doesn't know they are voluntary is ignorant, which is a totally separate issue. There are many ignorant pilots. BTW, here's a web site you might want to visit: http://www.faa.gov This organization encourages and supports the concept of local noise abatement procedures and pilots following them as long as: They are not discriminitory. They don't produce a special right. They are safe. They don't conflict with law. You should encourage the CCB airport manager to develop procedures like that. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Round Engines | john smith | Piloting | 20 | February 15th 07 03:31 AM |
induced airflow | buttman | Piloting | 3 | February 19th 06 04:36 AM |
Round Engines | Voxpopuli | Naval Aviation | 16 | May 31st 05 06:48 PM |
Source of Induced Drag | Ken Kochanski | Soaring | 2 | January 10th 04 12:18 AM |
Predicting ground effects on induced power | Marc Shorten | Soaring | 0 | October 28th 03 11:18 AM |