A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Defence plan to scrap F-111s



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 13th 03, 05:51 AM
L'acrobat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Brash" wrote in message
u...
"L'acrobat" wrote in message
...

"The CO" wrote in message
...
Move 3 RAR up to Enoggera.

Yep.


Great idea, it will **** away a small fortune in moving troops to and

from
PTS at Nowra and flying Hercs up to Amberley to pick up troops for Para
continuation, exercises and so on.


You must be out of the loop dip****. PTS have been known pack up their
bongos and operate out of Amberley (especially during winter) and the long
term plan is for Airlift Group to **** off from Richmond and move
to................... Amberley. Last time I strapped on a parachute and
jumped out of serviceable aircraft in-flight was from Amberley. Funny,
didn't see any gates.


3RAR is in Holsworthy because it is convenient to RAAF Richmond and PTS.


PTS should never have gone to Nowra in the first place. A questionable
decision if there ever was one.


If the DoD needs the opinion of a gate guard they will no doubt dictate it
to you.


  #2  
Old August 13th 03, 12:32 PM
Brash
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"L'acrobat" wrote in message
...

"Brash" wrote in message
u...
"L'acrobat" wrote in message
...

"The CO" wrote in message
...
Move 3 RAR up to Enoggera.

Yep.


Great idea, it will **** away a small fortune in moving troops to and

from
PTS at Nowra and flying Hercs up to Amberley to pick up troops for

Para
continuation, exercises and so on.


You must be out of the loop dip****. PTS have been known pack up their
bongos and operate out of Amberley (especially during winter) and the

long
term plan is for Airlift Group to **** off from Richmond and move
to................... Amberley. Last time I strapped on a parachute and
jumped out of serviceable aircraft in-flight was from Amberley. Funny,
didn't see any gates.


3RAR is in Holsworthy because it is convenient to RAAF Richmond and

PTS.

PTS should never have gone to Nowra in the first place. A questionable
decision if there ever was one.


If the DoD needs the opinion of a gate guard they will no doubt dictate it
to you.


And if they ever need strategic advice from an ex-private grunt, I'll give
them your number.

You're dismissed now Private (Rtd).

--
De Oppresso Liber.







  #3  
Old August 14th 03, 12:25 AM
L'acrobat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Brash" wrote in message
u...

PTS should never have gone to Nowra in the first place. A questionable
decision if there ever was one.


If the DoD needs the opinion of a gate guard they will no doubt dictate

it
to you.


And if they ever need strategic advice from an ex-private grunt, I'll give
them your number.

You're dismissed now Private (Rtd).


Poor gate guard, you are a second rate loser and you know it.

That must hurt.


  #4  
Old August 16th 03, 01:31 AM
smithxpj
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:25:38 +1000, "L'acrobat"
wrote:


Poor gate guard, you are a second rate loser and you know it.


Gate guards ain't in military uniform these days, Sunshine! The job
has been contracted out to civvy security companies.

Ipso facto, Brash ain't on a gate!!
  #5  
Old August 16th 03, 02:57 AM
L'acrobat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"smithxpj" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:25:38 +1000, "L'acrobat"
wrote:


Poor gate guard, you are a second rate loser and you know it.


Gate guards ain't in military uniform these days, Sunshine! The job
has been contracted out to civvy security companies.

Ipso facto, Brash ain't on a gate!!


Correct, they can't be trusted to carry out their only useful function any
longer.

It was the high point of his undistinguished career.


  #6  
Old August 18th 03, 09:37 AM
The CO
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"L'acrobat" wrote in message
...

"smithxpj" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:25:38 +1000, "L'acrobat"
wrote:


Poor gate guard, you are a second rate loser and you know it.


Gate guards ain't in military uniform these days, Sunshine! The job
has been contracted out to civvy security companies.

Ipso facto, Brash ain't on a gate!!


Correct, they can't be trusted to carry out their only useful function

any
longer.


AHEM!

Gentlemen. I realise that you have deep seated and perhaps
insurmountable differences of personality
and opinion, however this is getting out of hand.

M. L'Acrobat. As I am sure you *are* aware, the function of the ADG's
is to protect RAAF assets against
enemy action, particularly (though not exclusively) special forces type
attacks. You and Brash can play verbal
ping pong with each other all day if you like, Your constant ridiculing
of ADG's as a group is seriously discrediting a fine bunch of
professional fighting
men who are *at least* as good at small unit ground defence within their
specialist area as any infantry unit
of similar size and composition in the army. Emphasis on *specialist
area*. Key point protection is their
major role and they *are* very good at it. Consider who their likely
opposition would be and you understand
*why* they need to be very good at it.
They are skilled *way* beyond the 'gate guard' level, and you would only
see them in that role if the facility were
on a very high state of alert. Otherwise it's farmed out to civvie
security guards who are probably adequate at
that level. If you want to keep a long range sniping engagement with
Brash going, fill yer boots, however *I* would
appreciate it if you ceased to disparage an entire combat specialty in
the process.

Brash, you have quite a different perspective on things military than
L'Acrobat and that creates some marked differences
of opinion that a clash of personality tends to ramp up to an all out
****fight. You might also appreciate that L'Acrobat has
a *different* perspective as a former infantryman, and he naturally
tends to focus on that which seems important according to
his experience and training. I'm not suggesting you bury the hatchet, I
suspect that's unlikely at best, (except in respective heads)
but you might want to consider toning it down a notch, especially in
view of the bandwidth you are both consuming in here on what
is becoming mostly personal attacks and not debate (however heated). As
such it doesn't do either of you credit.

That said, it's a (mostly) free net and I have no authority to tell
anyone what to do (or not do), so if you disregard my advice, so be it.

However other members of the group might appreciate a little more debate
with a little less personal attack in the process...

Just my 2c worth, make of it what you will...

The CO


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IFR Flight Plan question Snowbird Instrument Flight Rules 5 August 13th 04 12:55 AM
NAS and associated computer system Newps Instrument Flight Rules 8 August 12th 04 05:12 AM
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan gwengler Instrument Flight Rules 4 August 11th 04 03:55 AM
IFR flight plan filing question Tune2828 Instrument Flight Rules 2 July 23rd 03 03:33 AM
USA Defence Budget Realities Stop SPAM! Military Aviation 17 July 9th 03 02:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.