![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brash" wrote in message u... "L'acrobat" wrote in message ... "The CO" wrote in message ... Move 3 RAR up to Enoggera. Yep. Great idea, it will **** away a small fortune in moving troops to and from PTS at Nowra and flying Hercs up to Amberley to pick up troops for Para continuation, exercises and so on. You must be out of the loop dip****. PTS have been known pack up their bongos and operate out of Amberley (especially during winter) and the long term plan is for Airlift Group to **** off from Richmond and move to................... Amberley. Last time I strapped on a parachute and jumped out of serviceable aircraft in-flight was from Amberley. Funny, didn't see any gates. 3RAR is in Holsworthy because it is convenient to RAAF Richmond and PTS. PTS should never have gone to Nowra in the first place. A questionable decision if there ever was one. If the DoD needs the opinion of a gate guard they will no doubt dictate it to you. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"L'acrobat" wrote in message
... "Brash" wrote in message u... "L'acrobat" wrote in message ... "The CO" wrote in message ... Move 3 RAR up to Enoggera. Yep. Great idea, it will **** away a small fortune in moving troops to and from PTS at Nowra and flying Hercs up to Amberley to pick up troops for Para continuation, exercises and so on. You must be out of the loop dip****. PTS have been known pack up their bongos and operate out of Amberley (especially during winter) and the long term plan is for Airlift Group to **** off from Richmond and move to................... Amberley. Last time I strapped on a parachute and jumped out of serviceable aircraft in-flight was from Amberley. Funny, didn't see any gates. 3RAR is in Holsworthy because it is convenient to RAAF Richmond and PTS. PTS should never have gone to Nowra in the first place. A questionable decision if there ever was one. If the DoD needs the opinion of a gate guard they will no doubt dictate it to you. And if they ever need strategic advice from an ex-private grunt, I'll give them your number. You're dismissed now Private (Rtd). -- De Oppresso Liber. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brash" wrote in message u... PTS should never have gone to Nowra in the first place. A questionable decision if there ever was one. If the DoD needs the opinion of a gate guard they will no doubt dictate it to you. And if they ever need strategic advice from an ex-private grunt, I'll give them your number. You're dismissed now Private (Rtd). Poor gate guard, you are a second rate loser and you know it. That must hurt. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:25:38 +1000, "L'acrobat"
wrote: Poor gate guard, you are a second rate loser and you know it. Gate guards ain't in military uniform these days, Sunshine! The job has been contracted out to civvy security companies. Ipso facto, Brash ain't on a gate!! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "smithxpj" wrote in message ... On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:25:38 +1000, "L'acrobat" wrote: Poor gate guard, you are a second rate loser and you know it. Gate guards ain't in military uniform these days, Sunshine! The job has been contracted out to civvy security companies. Ipso facto, Brash ain't on a gate!! Correct, they can't be trusted to carry out their only useful function any longer. It was the high point of his undistinguished career. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "L'acrobat" wrote in message ... "smithxpj" wrote in message ... On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:25:38 +1000, "L'acrobat" wrote: Poor gate guard, you are a second rate loser and you know it. Gate guards ain't in military uniform these days, Sunshine! The job has been contracted out to civvy security companies. Ipso facto, Brash ain't on a gate!! Correct, they can't be trusted to carry out their only useful function any longer. AHEM! Gentlemen. I realise that you have deep seated and perhaps insurmountable differences of personality and opinion, however this is getting out of hand. M. L'Acrobat. As I am sure you *are* aware, the function of the ADG's is to protect RAAF assets against enemy action, particularly (though not exclusively) special forces type attacks. You and Brash can play verbal ping pong with each other all day if you like, Your constant ridiculing of ADG's as a group is seriously discrediting a fine bunch of professional fighting men who are *at least* as good at small unit ground defence within their specialist area as any infantry unit of similar size and composition in the army. Emphasis on *specialist area*. Key point protection is their major role and they *are* very good at it. Consider who their likely opposition would be and you understand *why* they need to be very good at it. They are skilled *way* beyond the 'gate guard' level, and you would only see them in that role if the facility were on a very high state of alert. Otherwise it's farmed out to civvie security guards who are probably adequate at that level. If you want to keep a long range sniping engagement with Brash going, fill yer boots, however *I* would appreciate it if you ceased to disparage an entire combat specialty in the process. Brash, you have quite a different perspective on things military than L'Acrobat and that creates some marked differences of opinion that a clash of personality tends to ramp up to an all out ****fight. You might also appreciate that L'Acrobat has a *different* perspective as a former infantryman, and he naturally tends to focus on that which seems important according to his experience and training. I'm not suggesting you bury the hatchet, I suspect that's unlikely at best, (except in respective heads) but you might want to consider toning it down a notch, especially in view of the bandwidth you are both consuming in here on what is becoming mostly personal attacks and not debate (however heated). As such it doesn't do either of you credit. That said, it's a (mostly) free net and I have no authority to tell anyone what to do (or not do), so if you disregard my advice, so be it. However other members of the group might appreciate a little more debate with a little less personal attack in the process... Just my 2c worth, make of it what you will... The CO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IFR Flight Plan question | Snowbird | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | August 13th 04 12:55 AM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan | gwengler | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | August 11th 04 03:55 AM |
IFR flight plan filing question | Tune2828 | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | July 23rd 03 03:33 AM |
USA Defence Budget Realities | Stop SPAM! | Military Aviation | 17 | July 9th 03 02:11 AM |