A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why The Hell... (random rant)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 5th 07, 04:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.piloting
EridanMan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 208
Default Why The Hell... (random rant)

GPS finds true north. And, just incidentally, you can find true north by
looking at the sky. ANS will do that, and people can do it, too.


As an expert in Location based services and GPS, let me assure you
that depending solely on GPS for any form of navigation is a fools
errand that is going to get a lot of people killed one of these
days.

The system is a rube goldberg contraption with an instant-on kill
switch. Wait until someone launches a home-made GPS guided cruise
missile into Washington DC, watch them flick the switch, and see what
happens. Just hope it doesn't happen at night, and you're not in the
air at the time.

Documenting them doesn't really eliminate them.


It does make you aware of them, which is all you need.

GPS is better, and more accurate, to name just one.


It also requires constant, very expensive maintenance, a complex
receiver in good working order, and as I mentioned, can be turned off
at the push of a button. None of these are traits you want for you
primary navigation system.

You can find true north by looking at the sky, or with GPS, or with ANS
(automated looking at the sky), or with an INS. The latter usually has to be
on the ground, although some systems support align-in-motion with a longer
setup time.


The simplest, fastest and most dependable (in VMC) way of finding true
north (or any form of navigation) is simple spatial awareness and
pilotage. A good chart, and a good eye.

You need a precise clock to do just about any navigation. The need for the
rest is debatable, depending on how resourceful you are.


Not at all... about the only modern navigation that requires a precise
clock is night over uninhabited terrain or over water.

Unless the airplane is a glider, you have power.


GPS have batteries, power isn't the issue. The problem (in my
experience) with GPS is that they're _SO_ good that people very
quickly delegate all of their navigational requirements to them,
letting their pilotage, dead reaconing, and other navigational skills
atrophy (in my humble experience at least). This is fine, until the
tremendously complex system finally fails (either intentionally or
otherwise). Either way, its not something I want to bet my life on.

One third correct: it requires power, but engines provide power. It doesn't
have to be set up against anything else to find true north. It doesn't need
to be constantly updated; the whole idea is to be fairly autonomous.


The whole idea of navigation is to know where you are in space at any
given time. Autonomy is irrelevant.

  #2  
Old April 5th 07, 05:01 AM posted to rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.piloting
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default Why The Hell... (random rant)



EridanMan wrote:



GPS have batteries, power isn't the issue. The problem (in my
experience) with GPS is that they're _SO_ good that people very
quickly delegate all of their navigational requirements to them,
letting their pilotage, dead reaconing, and other navigational skills
atrophy (in my humble experience at least). This is fine, until the
tremendously complex system finally fails (either intentionally or
otherwise). Either way, its not something I want to bet my life on.


The exact, word for word, arguments against VOR, NDB, four course
ranges, colored lights, etc. It goes on and on.
  #3  
Old April 5th 07, 05:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.piloting
EridanMan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 208
Default Why The Hell... (random rant)

On Apr 4, 8:01 pm, Newps wrote:
EridanMan wrote:

GPS have batteries, power isn't the issue. The problem (in my
experience) with GPS is that they're _SO_ good that people very
quickly delegate all of their navigational requirements to them,
letting their pilotage, dead reaconing, and other navigational skills
atrophy (in my humble experience at least). This is fine, until the
tremendously complex system finally fails (either intentionally or
otherwise). Either way, its not something I want to bet my life on.


The exact, word for word, arguments against VOR, NDB, four course
ranges, colored lights, etc. It goes on and on.


I think I have to give you that point, set and match.

  #4  
Old April 5th 07, 05:35 AM posted to rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Why The Hell... (random rant)

In rec.aviation.piloting Newps wrote:


EridanMan wrote:




GPS have batteries, power isn't the issue. The problem (in my
experience) with GPS is that they're _SO_ good that people very
quickly delegate all of their navigational requirements to them,
letting their pilotage, dead reaconing, and other navigational skills
atrophy (in my humble experience at least). This is fine, until the
tremendously complex system finally fails (either intentionally or
otherwise). Either way, its not something I want to bet my life on.


The exact, word for word, arguments against VOR, NDB, four course
ranges, colored lights, etc. It goes on and on.


But, it is a good arguement for not doing away with all the other
backup systems since GPS can totally go away for a number of reasons.

I don't see much real use for NDB's these days (ignoring for a moment
not everywhere has a GPS approach, but that's just a paper work
problem) with VOR's and GPS available.

If some new, independant, system becomes available, then VOR's become
obsolete and can be turned off like the four course ranges were.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #5  
Old April 5th 07, 06:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Why The Hell... (random rant)

Newps writes:

The exact, word for word, arguments against VOR, NDB, four course
ranges, colored lights, etc. It goes on and on.


And correct each time.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #6  
Old April 5th 07, 06:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Why The Hell... (random rant)

EridanMan writes:

The system is a rube goldberg contraption with an instant-on kill
switch.


There is no instant-on kill switch. It takes quite a bit of time to send
commands to all the satellites.

Wait until someone launches a home-made GPS guided cruise
missile into Washington DC, watch them flick the switch, and see what
happens. Just hope it doesn't happen at night, and you're not in the
air at the time.


They can't do that any more. It would be a worse disaster to turn it off than
it would be to just let it run, for both military and civilian use.

It also requires constant, very expensive maintenance, a complex
receiver in good working order, and as I mentioned, can be turned off
at the push of a button. None of these are traits you want for you
primary navigation system.


It cannot be turned off at the push of a button. I'm not aware of any
constant maintenance requirement. Databases have to be updated by a
monopolistic price-gouging private enterprise, but that's a separate issue.

The simplest, fastest and most dependable (in VMC) way of finding true
north (or any form of navigation) is simple spatial awareness and
pilotage. A good chart, and a good eye.


I wouldn't trust those.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #7  
Old April 5th 07, 04:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Why The Hell... (random rant)

In rec.aviation.piloting Mxsmanic wrote:
EridanMan writes:


The system is a rube goldberg contraption with an instant-on kill
switch.


There is no instant-on kill switch. It takes quite a bit of time to send
commands to all the satellites.


Yeah, a few seconds once the decision is made.

Wait until someone launches a home-made GPS guided cruise
missile into Washington DC, watch them flick the switch, and see what
happens. Just hope it doesn't happen at night, and you're not in the
air at the time.


They can't do that any more. It would be a worse disaster to turn it off than
it would be to just let it run, for both military and civilian use.


If backup systems like VOR, NDB, LORAN didn't exist, that might be
true, but the backukp systems do exist.

It also requires constant, very expensive maintenance, a complex
receiver in good working order, and as I mentioned, can be turned off
at the push of a button. None of these are traits you want for you
primary navigation system.


It cannot be turned off at the push of a button. I'm not aware of any
constant maintenance requirement. Databases have to be updated by a
monopolistic price-gouging private enterprise, but that's a separate issue.


We'll just add that to the long and growing list of things you are
not aware of.

The simplest, fastest and most dependable (in VMC) way of finding true
north (or any form of navigation) is simple spatial awareness and
pilotage. A good chart, and a good eye.


I wouldn't trust those.


That's because you haven't a clue as to how to use them, especially
the awareness part.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RANT! wise purchaser Owning 2 March 27th 07 10:04 PM
Random thoughts 2 Bill Daniels Soaring 6 September 1st 06 05:37 AM
A Jeppesen rant Peter R. Piloting 4 January 17th 05 03:54 AM
Why didn't GWB [insert rant] Jack Military Aviation 1 July 15th 04 11:30 PM
Random Hold Generator... Tina Marie Instrument Flight Rules 0 November 5th 03 04:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.