A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

KOSU Arrival ATIS



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 6th 07, 01:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 690
Default KOSU Arrival ATIS

In a previous article, Ron Natalie said:
procedures. Another problem with the old frequency was that
it was actually in use by ATC and when blazing up from Milwaukee
you'd actually hear planes talking to ATC on it.


I had that problem crossing Lake Michigan in 2005. Then ATIS was saying
that the camping was full, but when we landed there were plenty of spots.

Personally, I think they should tell people who don't have the NOTAM to
get the **** out of the airspace rather than tying up the frequency like
that moron last year.

--
Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of
tapes hurtling down the highway.
-- Andrew Tannenbaum possibly quoting Warren Jackson
  #2  
Old April 6th 07, 02:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default KOSU Arrival ATIS

Paul Tomblin wrote:

I had that problem crossing Lake Michigan in 2005. Then ATIS was saying
that the camping was full, but when we landed there were plenty of spots.


Spots on the field open and close throughout the show. Combine this
with the fact that there are no fewer than three classes of parking
these days because of endless turf wars between homebuilders, warbirds,
antique/classic, etc...


Personally, I think they should tell people who don't have the NOTAM to
get the **** out of the airspace rather than tying up the frequency like
that moron last year.


That would work for me. Tell them to go to Appleton and read the NOTAM.
But sometimes it's better to get the idiots out of the air and on the
ground where they can do less harm.
  #3  
Old April 6th 07, 02:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 979
Default KOSU Arrival ATIS


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message m...
:
:
: That would work for me. Tell them to go to Appleton and read the NOTAM.
: But sometimes it's better to get the idiots out of the air and on the
: ground where they can do less harm.



They should also be written up for not having all the information pertinent to the flight...


  #4  
Old April 6th 07, 02:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default KOSU Arrival ATIS

Blueskies wrote:
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message m...
:
:
: That would work for me. Tell them to go to Appleton and read the NOTAM.
: But sometimes it's better to get the idiots out of the air and on the
: ground where they can do less harm.



They should also be written up for not having all the information pertinent to the flight...


Frankly, the last thing we need is FAA enforcement trolling around for
business at Oshkosh.
  #5  
Old April 6th 07, 03:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default KOSU Arrival ATIS


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...

Frankly, the last thing we need is FAA enforcement trolling around for
business at Oshkosh.


Probably. But it wouldn't hurt to have greater enforcement of FARs that
actually have an adverse affect on others.


  #6  
Old April 7th 07, 12:21 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 979
Default KOSU Arrival ATIS


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message m...
: Blueskies wrote:
: "Ron Natalie" wrote in message m...
: :
: :
: : That would work for me. Tell them to go to Appleton and read the NOTAM.
: : But sometimes it's better to get the idiots out of the air and on the
: : ground where they can do less harm.
:
:
:
: They should also be written up for not having all the information pertinent to the flight...
:
:
: Frankly, the last thing we need is FAA enforcement trolling around for
: business at Oshkosh.


Well, if we have laws, they should be enforced. If the law is not necessary it should be removed. Selective enforcement
has a lot to do with the problems we have in this country...



  #7  
Old April 7th 07, 02:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default KOSU Arrival ATIS


Well, if we have laws, they should be enforced. If the law is not necessary it should be removed. Selective enforcement
has a lot to do with the problems we have in this country...


Don't get me freaking started on here. We don't have laws.
We have a sham of a regulatory process which even thought one
agency is tasked with enacting them, enforcing them, and judging
them, they still make ad hoc rules and interpretations that
make a sham of even their own self-centered regulation
system. It leads to a lot of abuse which is nothing short
of unconstitutional deprivation of liberty and property
without due process of law.

So yes, the FAA needs reform. Until then, keep the regulatory
jack boots away from the major events when they are not strictly needed.


  #8  
Old April 6th 07, 02:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default KOSU Arrival ATIS


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...

That would work for me. Tell them to go to Appleton and read the NOTAM.
But sometimes it's better to get the idiots out of the air and on the
ground where they can do less harm.


The NOTAM has arrival procedures for Appleton as well. Perhaps an airport
less impacted by the event would be a better choice.


  #9  
Old April 7th 07, 02:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default KOSU Arrival ATIS

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...
That would work for me. Tell them to go to Appleton and read the NOTAM.
But sometimes it's better to get the idiots out of the air and on the
ground where they can do less harm.


The NOTAM has arrival procedures for Appleton as well. Perhaps an airport
less impacted by the event would be a better choice.



Yeah, but it's just listen to the ATIS and call the tower. There are
a few reporting points marked, but it's not anywhere as involved as any
of the Wittman field arrivals.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
old calculators of arrival albatros Soaring 0 January 4th 05 03:02 PM
KSFO ATIS: "FG IN GAP W" David Ziemba Instrument Flight Rules 3 July 20th 04 02:13 PM
KSFO ATIS: "FG IN GAP W" David Ziemba General Aviation 3 July 20th 04 02:13 PM
OAK arrival procedure ROBIN FLY Instrument Flight Rules 5 October 1st 03 03:05 AM
Lost comm - Arrival Michael 182 Instrument Flight Rules 3 July 28th 03 12:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.