![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dylan Smith" wrote in message ... On 2007-04-05, Skylune wrote: The AOPA only publishes propaganda in their efforts to maintain the massive tax subsidies, and to cover up the FAAs lack of any enforcement. What's the incremental cost of light GA? Almost zero. All that infrastructure that is supposedly subsidised for GA exists solely for the benefit of business and the airlines. Light GA would continue to exist quite happily without ATC or the FAA (indeed, would probably work better) or any of these other so-called subsidised services which only are actually required because of the airlines or for-profit business aviation. Its hard to believe that you really think that Dylan. Saying that Light GA does not need ATC or the FAA is one way of getting excluded from them by the airlines and then when they become the owner of the infrastructure will charge through the nose to let light GA back in when Light GA realises that some of the services were worthwhile. I suspect that ATC spends as much time keeping CAT away from light GA as it does keeping CAT apart. Improved technology like mode S and ADB-S is great for the heavy end but giving like GA access to it just means that they end up hanging around the same airspace as CAT and need separating. Bring Class A airspace down to 5000' agl, that keeps the IFR traffic in one area away from the VFR stuff below, the IFR stuff can pay for having exclusive access to that airspace away from the poor trash VFR stuff who have it for free. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-04-06, Borat wrote:
Its hard to believe that you really think that Dylan. Saying that Light GA does not need ATC or the FAA is one way of getting excluded from them by the airlines and then when they become the owner of the infrastructure will charge through the nose to let light GA back in when Light GA realises that some of the services were worthwhile. You misread the intent of my message: the point is if airlines did not exist, then the remainder of aviation could quite happily exist without ATC or the FAA in most instances. ATC only came about because the airlines exist. Now GA is being forced to pay for services that only exist to make it possible for airlines to exist. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT - Movie Night at the Inn, 4-month review | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 30 | September 16th 06 04:05 PM |
A rough month for BD5J's | Richard Riley | Home Built | 14 | July 9th 06 01:09 PM |
SpaceShipOne to go the distance this month? | Vaughn | Home Built | 2 | June 3rd 04 02:43 PM |
CHEROKEE NATIONAL FLY-IN & CONVENTION - THIS MONTH! | Don | Owning | 0 | June 3rd 04 05:03 AM |
Followup.. Houston fatals last month.. | Dave S | Piloting | 7 | January 5th 04 05:08 PM |