![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote .. Snowbird writes: That's your opinion then. I can speak from my own experience, I've been in that situation a few times and the magnetic compass has been a great help. In a jet airliner? (That was the aircraft being discussed.) I see no reference to jet airliners in the OP's post. On the contrary, since he referred to his own flightplanning, that likely implies he flies a light aircraft. An airliner pilot would presumably have the airline's planning department do these chores for him. I'll grant that it would be okay in a tiny aircraft with just you as passenger. It would be as bad as nothing at all in the case of a large airliner with hundreds of people aboard. Your opinion again. That airliner captain would have training and experience in using a magnetic compass, so it certainly would be better than nothing to him. Of course without training and practical experience in using the magnetic compass, its value is limited. But using it happens to be included in the pilot's license curriculum, and for a reason. How often do pilots practice flying with just a compass once they've obtained their licenses? There are such things as proficiency check flights, where the examiner may choose to test the pilot's knowledge on that subject. Pilots obviously want to pass the checkride. Anyway, it's not a particularly difficult skill. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Snowbird writes:
I see no reference to jet airliners in the OP's post. It was in the posts preceding mine. Your opinion again. That airliner captain would have training and experience in using a magnetic compass, so it certainly would be better than nothing to him. It's better than nothing in the sense that hitting dirt is better than hitting concrete. There are such things as proficiency check flights, where the examiner may choose to test the pilot's knowledge on that subject. Pilots obviously want to pass the checkride. Anyway, it's not a particularly difficult skill. Okay, how many private pilots are compelled to demonstrate flying with just a compass alone for proficiency check flights? And how realistic is such a demonstration; that is, how often are pilots actually in this type of situation in real life? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote .. Your opinion again. That airliner captain would have training and experience in using a magnetic compass, so it certainly would be better than nothing to him. It's better than nothing Good, we're making some progress. in the sense that hitting dirt is better than hitting concrete. I don't find that comparison universally valid, so I have to disregard it. For example, if you have to make a gear-up landing, you are advised to do it on concrete rather than grass (or dirt). That's what the literature says anyway. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Snowbird writes:
I don't find that comparison universally valid, so I have to disregard it. For example, if you have to make a gear-up landing, you are advised to do it on concrete rather than grass (or dirt). That's what the literature says anyway. But both are considered accidents, as opposed to a normal landing with gear, which is not an accident. Thus, while a landing on one surface may do less damage than a landing on another surface, that is not a huge consolation to the pilot who has to land without gear. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote
Okay, how many private pilots are compelled to demonstrate flying with just a compass alone for proficiency check flights? And how realistic is such a demonstration; that is, how often are pilots actually in this type of situation in real life? Just about any decent instrument BFR or IPC is going to involve a loss of the DG or HSI in IMC. BDS |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BDS writes:
Just about any decent instrument BFR or IPC is going to involve a loss of the DG or HSI in IMC. But those are only a few of many instruments. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote... BDS writes: Just about any decent instrument BFR or IPC is going to involve a loss of the DG or HSI in IMC. But those are only a few of many instruments. I'm not sure that any of this applies to you since I don't think you ever simulate failures or simulate flying without the autopilot doing all of the work. But, just for fun you may want to try shooting a VOR or ILS approach without your HSI/DG and without the compass (or GPS) and let us know how you do. You may find it difficult to intercept the final approach course and track it inbound with no heading reference. BDS |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BDS writes:
I'm not sure that any of this applies to you since I don't think you ever simulate failures or simulate flying without the autopilot doing all of the work. I regularly fly by hand in small aircraft, but only occasionally in large aircraft, as these practices are realistic. A sim only produces failures if you request them, and I usually don't, unless I want to practice something specific, such as engine failure. Practicing failure scenarios is quite academic in a simulator, and doesn't serve much purpose unless you intend to fly a real aircraft. It can be interesting for other reasons, though. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote Practicing failure scenarios is quite academic in a simulator, and doesn't serve much purpose unless you intend to fly a real aircraft. It can be interesting for other reasons, though. Yes, it could show you how useful your compass can be for instance. BDS |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... BDS writes: I'm not sure that any of this applies to you since I don't think you ever simulate failures or simulate flying without the autopilot doing all of the work. I regularly fly by hand in small aircraft, but only occasionally in large aircraft, as these practices are realistic. No your don't, you don't fly anything but a desk A sim only produces failures if you request them, and I usually don't, unless I want to practice something specific, such as engine failure. Practicing failure scenarios is quite academic in a simulator, and doesn't serve much purpose unless you intend to fly a real aircraft. It can be interesting for other reasons, though. You how did you come to suffer the delusion that you could operate a real aircraft in IMC. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RANT! | wise purchaser | Owning | 2 | March 27th 07 10:04 PM |
Random thoughts 2 | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 6 | September 1st 06 05:37 AM |
A Jeppesen rant | Peter R. | Piloting | 4 | January 17th 05 03:54 AM |
Why didn't GWB [insert rant] | Jack | Military Aviation | 1 | July 15th 04 11:30 PM |
Random Hold Generator... | Tina Marie | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | November 5th 03 04:21 PM |