![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg Esres" wrote in message ... As has been pointed out by other posters, the Military has their own regulation bringing them into compliance with some sections of CFR14, but this document is controlled by the military and is in no way subject to FAA review. This law you speak of was created by the Congress that you say has no power over the military. I never wrote that Congress has no power over the Military. Please do try to keep the voices in your head from taking over your side of the debate. # U.S. Code: * 10 U.S.C. - Armed Forces * 18 U.S.C. § 1024 - Purchase or Receipt of Military, Naval, or Veteran's Facilities Property * 32 U.S.C. - National Guard * 37 U.S.C. - Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services * 38 U.S.C. - Veterans' Benefits * 50 U.S.C. - War and National Defense The President being Commander-in-Chief in no way reduces the ability of Congress to make laws governing the military. All these are funding issues Esres; an issue I explicitly pointed out Congress controls. You see Esres, these united States operate under a three branch system of Government. Each of these branches has explicit power granted under the Constitution and then Congress has delegated some powers to the Executive. Congress, having delegated powers to the Excutive, does not increase the Constitutional powers of Congress. Esres, you are persueing a false premise. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All these are funding issues Esres;
There are not. You haven't scanned through Title 10. Covers the whole gamut of issues. you are persueing a false premise. My premise is you don't know what you're talking about. That doesn't preclude you from being right; you know the saw about a stopped clock.... But you need to offer evidence, and you haven't. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg Esres" wrote in message ... All these are funding issues Esres; There are not. You haven't scanned through Title 10. Covers the whole gamut of issues. I'll go with title 49, when it comes to FAA authority. You are very confused about how the system works, Esres. I have filed and had executed a First Amendment petitioin WRT FAA. That petition provided FAA ACOs with 99 people and later with $250 million; Tom Mc Sweeny was the only FAA management survivor in DC. Now he is off on a golden parachute ride with Boeing and for a little listening, US common carriers can now boast of two zero killed years. Ken Mean also assisted me in my seeking regulatory Relief and so my Congressman placed him in the Inspector General's position at US DOT. The reform of FAA was a very effective political issue for Republicans and my Congressman is now Chair of Ways and Means. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USAF axes the bicycle aerobics test | S. Sampson | Military Aviation | 22 | August 10th 03 03:50 AM |
FS Books USAF, Navy, Marine pilots and planes | Ken Insch | Military Aviation | 0 | July 20th 03 02:36 AM |
NZ plane lands safely with help from USAF | Jughead | Military Aviation | 0 | July 6th 03 10:23 PM |
From Col.Greg Davis USAF (ret) | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | July 3rd 03 07:56 PM |