A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Gamma Ray Bomb



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 14th 03, 09:19 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message

...
"Eric Moore" wrote in message
om...
Work is being done on a Gamma Ray Bomb. See:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/...018361,00.html

How would a weapon like this compare to the current generation of
nukes?
Just curious.


It sounds bogus to me.


So do most of your replies!

I'm no physicist but a claim like


And no scientist, bioengineer, intelligence operative, representative
of any Govt., and no aviation expert either...


Correct


"Just one gram of the explosive would store more energy than
50kg of conventional TNT"

Needs a lot of evidence and thus far I have seen none

Keith


What do you want the US Govt. to do... Fed-Ex one to your doorstep
when its completed?


No I want more factual information from the people who wrote
the article

Rob

p.s. Who needs a troll when you have a resident egomaniac like Keith
Wilshaw at RAM?


Pot Kettle etc

Keith


  #2  
Old August 15th 03, 01:58 AM
John Mullen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...

"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message

...
"Eric Moore" wrote in message
om...
Work is being done on a Gamma Ray Bomb. See:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/...018361,00.html

How would a weapon like this compare to the current generation

of
nukes?
Just curious.

It sounds bogus to me.


So do most of your replies!

I'm no physicist but a claim like


And no scientist, bioengineer, intelligence operative, representative
of any Govt., and no aviation expert either...


Correct


"Just one gram of the explosive would store more energy than
50kg of conventional TNT"

Needs a lot of evidence and thus far I have seen none

Keith


What do you want the US Govt. to do... Fed-Ex one to your doorstep
when its completed?


No I want more factual information from the people who wrote
the article


The New Scientist article the Grauniad one was based on is quite interesting

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994049

Best

John


  #3  
Old August 15th 03, 02:52 AM
Walt BJ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So - "Four years ago scientists at U/Texas showed how to trigger a
change in half-life." Funny we never read about it in Science, Science
News, Nature or Scientific American nor has the Nobel Committee acted
on this. Nothing (other than the journalists' citation) has been
bruited about on this. Personally, my idea is that the wishful
thinkers are kicking about the old matter-antimatter reaction. Only
two problems - 1) making a significant quantity of antimatter and 2)
keeping it from reacting with ordinary matter. Solve those two
problems and you have a gamma ray bomb plus any size weapon you want.
Meanwhile I'll be searching UT to see what they actually did four
years ago.
Walt BJ
  #4  
Old August 16th 03, 03:18 AM
Denyav
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So - "Four years ago scientists at U/Texas showed how to trigger a
change in half-life." Funny we never read about it in Science, Science
News, Nature or Scientific American nor has the Nobel Committee acted
on this. Nothing (other than the


Scientists of Institute for Transuran in Karsruhe Germany reduced the decay
period of Jod128 from million years to a couple of minutes using laser
pulses,but they did not get any nobel prize either.

  #5  
Old August 16th 03, 11:06 AM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Denyav" wrote in message
...
So - "Four years ago scientists at U/Texas showed how to trigger a
change in half-life." Funny we never read about it in Science, Science
News, Nature or Scientific American nor has the Nobel Committee acted
on this. Nothing (other than the


Scientists of Institute for Transuran in Karsruhe Germany reduced the

decay
period of Jod128 from million years to a couple of minutes using laser
pulses,but they did not get any nobel prize either.


Last I heard the highest number transuranic element was 118 and its
half life was less than a millisecond.

You've been hallucinating again Denyav

Keith


  #6  
Old August 16th 03, 05:12 PM
Denyav
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Last I heard the highest number transuranic element was 118 and its
half life was less than a millisecond.

You've been hallucinating again Denyav


It proves that your knowledge base needs updating Jod128 is highly radioactive
by-product of nuclear reactors,it decays into stabile Jod129 in million years.
Karlsruhe scientists shortened this process to a few minutes using laser
pulses.
If Karlsruhe is too far for you, you might want to contact University of
Strathclyde in Glasgow,Glasgow scientists were also equally succesful in this
issue.(They did not get any Nobel Prize either!)
  #7  
Old August 16th 03, 05:39 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Denyav" wrote in message
...
Last I heard the highest number transuranic element was 118 and its
half life was less than a millisecond.

You've been hallucinating again Denyav


It proves that your knowledge base needs updating Jod128 is highly

radioactive
by-product of nuclear reactors,it decays into stabile Jod129 in million

years.
Karlsruhe scientists shortened this process to a few minutes using laser
pulses.
If Karlsruhe is too far for you, you might want to contact University of
Strathclyde in Glasgow,Glasgow scientists were also equally succesful in

this
issue.(They did not get any Nobel Prize either!)


What they did at Strathclyde was speed up the decay
of IODINE 129 to iodine 128

That element is represented by the letter I

At least try and get some of the basics right when you bull****
there's a good chap.

Keith


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In zeno Instrument Flight Rules 0 October 30th 04 06:20 PM
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In zeno Home Built 0 October 30th 04 06:19 PM
FORMATIONS, BOMB RUNS AND RADIUS OF ACTION ArtKramr Military Aviation 0 August 10th 03 02:22 AM
The written History of the 344th Bomb Group ArtKramr Military Aviation 1 July 8th 03 07:05 PM
The Swedish Nuclear Bomb robert arndt Military Aviation 0 July 2nd 03 05:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.