A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Question to Mxmanic



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 16th 07, 04:21 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
DR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 44
Default Question to Mxmanic

Mxsmanic wrote:
Judah writes:

What is the wingspan of the aircraft?


The wingspan shouldn't matter.

Altimeters make this less likely than you might believe. Perhaps you are the
one that doesn't realize something. As you admit below, you didn't put much
thought into your determination.


To convince me, I need an explanation of why wakes descend universally except
by some magic exception when someone is doing a 360-degree turn.

Perhaps you are not considering all the causes of turbulence that follow
an aircraft (in it's wake)?

Cheers MarkC
  #2  
Old April 16th 07, 04:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Question to Mxmanic

DR writes:

Perhaps you are not considering all the causes of turbulence that follow
an aircraft (in it's wake)?


Perhaps others are not considering all the causes of turbulence besides
aircraft wakes.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #3  
Old April 16th 07, 04:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Question to Mxmanic

In rec.aviation.piloting Mxsmanic wrote:
DR writes:


Perhaps you are not considering all the causes of turbulence that follow
an aircraft (in it's wake)?


Perhaps others are not considering all the causes of turbulence besides
aircraft wakes.


You do a 360 and run into a bump when, and only when, you complete
the 360.

Invisible UFO's crossing at your exact starting point?


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #5  
Old April 16th 07, 10:30 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
mike regish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 438
Default Question to Mxmanic

On a bumpy day you wouldn't be able to tell the wake from the overall
turbulence.

On an otherwise smooth day you can.

It can be done, Tony.

mike

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
writes:

You do a 360 and run into a bump when, and only when, you complete
the 360.


Or you run into bumps but only notice the one that you hit when you
complete
the 360.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.



  #6  
Old April 16th 07, 03:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Question to Mxmanic

mike regish writes:

On a bumpy day you wouldn't be able to tell the wake from the overall
turbulence.


I agree.

On an otherwise smooth day you can.


Probably--if you actually hit it.

It can be done, Tony.


Not without descending. The wake _must_ descend. This means that you cannot
catch it unless you descend, also. If you can explain how this rule can be
broken, I'm listening.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #7  
Old April 16th 07, 04:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Maxwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,116
Default Question to Mxmanic


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
mike regish writes:

On a bumpy day you wouldn't be able to tell the wake from the overall
turbulence.


I agree.

On an otherwise smooth day you can.


Probably--if you actually hit it.

It can be done, Tony.


Not without descending. The wake _must_ descend. This means that you
cannot
catch it unless you descend, also. If you can explain how this rule can
be
broken, I'm listening.


Total bull****. You haven't a clue.


  #8  
Old April 16th 07, 04:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
rq3
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default Question to Mxmanic



Mxsmanic wrote:
Not without descending. The wake _must_ descend. This means that you cannot
catch it unless you descend, also. If you can explain how this rule can be
broken, I'm listening.

Then listen hard. The wake consists of more than just the downwash you
are fixated on. If you have ever seen a sky-writer at work, you would
know, even without setting foot in a real aircraft, that it is possible
to return to the same parcel of air and pass through the smoke you had
left previously.
On a calm day, no descending or climbing is required.
Your problem is your fixation on your assumptions, and then insisting
that physical reality must be wrong when your limited assumptions don't
square with that reality, a true sign of immaturity and a basic
inability to assimilate the information that your own senses provide.
Anthony, I'm actually beginning to feel sorry for you. I believe that
you have real, diagnosable mental issues.

Rip
  #9  
Old April 16th 07, 05:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Question to Mxmanic

In rec.aviation.piloting Mxsmanic wrote:
mike regish writes:


On a bumpy day you wouldn't be able to tell the wake from the overall
turbulence.


I agree.


On an otherwise smooth day you can.


Probably--if you actually hit it.


It can be done, Tony.


Not without descending. The wake _must_ descend. This means that you cannot
catch it unless you descend, also. If you can explain how this rule can be
broken, I'm listening.


What rule?

All we have is the babblings of a Microsoft game player.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #10  
Old April 16th 07, 07:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
mike regish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 438
Default Question to Mxmanic

We have. Rising air. It happens all the time over the plowed cornfields I
fly over. The plane doesn't also rise with the air because we are
maintaining out altitude above the ground.

mike
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...

If you can explain how this rule can be
broken, I'm listening.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to ask you the most important question of your life. The question is: Are you saved? It is no gasman Soaring 0 August 26th 05 06:39 PM
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good Excelsior Home Built 0 April 22nd 05 01:11 AM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.