![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Judah writes: What is the wingspan of the aircraft? The wingspan shouldn't matter. Altimeters make this less likely than you might believe. Perhaps you are the one that doesn't realize something. As you admit below, you didn't put much thought into your determination. To convince me, I need an explanation of why wakes descend universally except by some magic exception when someone is doing a 360-degree turn. Perhaps you are not considering all the causes of turbulence that follow an aircraft (in it's wake)? Cheers MarkC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DR writes:
Perhaps you are not considering all the causes of turbulence that follow an aircraft (in it's wake)? Perhaps others are not considering all the causes of turbulence besides aircraft wakes. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.piloting Mxsmanic wrote:
DR writes: Perhaps you are not considering all the causes of turbulence that follow an aircraft (in it's wake)? Perhaps others are not considering all the causes of turbulence besides aircraft wakes. You do a 360 and run into a bump when, and only when, you complete the 360. Invisible UFO's crossing at your exact starting point? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On a bumpy day you wouldn't be able to tell the wake from the overall
turbulence. On an otherwise smooth day you can. It can be done, Tony. mike "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... writes: You do a 360 and run into a bump when, and only when, you complete the 360. Or you run into bumps but only notice the one that you hit when you complete the 360. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mike regish writes:
On a bumpy day you wouldn't be able to tell the wake from the overall turbulence. I agree. On an otherwise smooth day you can. Probably--if you actually hit it. It can be done, Tony. Not without descending. The wake _must_ descend. This means that you cannot catch it unless you descend, also. If you can explain how this rule can be broken, I'm listening. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... mike regish writes: On a bumpy day you wouldn't be able to tell the wake from the overall turbulence. I agree. On an otherwise smooth day you can. Probably--if you actually hit it. It can be done, Tony. Not without descending. The wake _must_ descend. This means that you cannot catch it unless you descend, also. If you can explain how this rule can be broken, I'm listening. Total bull****. You haven't a clue. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mxsmanic wrote: Not without descending. The wake _must_ descend. This means that you cannot catch it unless you descend, also. If you can explain how this rule can be broken, I'm listening. Then listen hard. The wake consists of more than just the downwash you are fixated on. If you have ever seen a sky-writer at work, you would know, even without setting foot in a real aircraft, that it is possible to return to the same parcel of air and pass through the smoke you had left previously. On a calm day, no descending or climbing is required. Your problem is your fixation on your assumptions, and then insisting that physical reality must be wrong when your limited assumptions don't square with that reality, a true sign of immaturity and a basic inability to assimilate the information that your own senses provide. Anthony, I'm actually beginning to feel sorry for you. I believe that you have real, diagnosable mental issues. Rip |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.piloting Mxsmanic wrote:
mike regish writes: On a bumpy day you wouldn't be able to tell the wake from the overall turbulence. I agree. On an otherwise smooth day you can. Probably--if you actually hit it. It can be done, Tony. Not without descending. The wake _must_ descend. This means that you cannot catch it unless you descend, also. If you can explain how this rule can be broken, I'm listening. What rule? All we have is the babblings of a Microsoft game player. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have. Rising air. It happens all the time over the plowed cornfields I
fly over. The plane doesn't also rise with the air because we are maintaining out altitude above the ground. mike "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... If you can explain how this rule can be broken, I'm listening. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to ask you the most important question of your life. The question is: Are you saved? It is no | gasman | Soaring | 0 | August 26th 05 06:39 PM |
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | Excelsior | Home Built | 0 | April 22nd 05 01:11 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |