Question to Mxmanic

Mxsmanic wrote:
Not without descending. The wake _must_ descend. This means that you cannot
catch it unless you descend, also. If you can explain how this rule can be
broken, I'm listening.

Then listen hard. The wake consists of more than just the downwash you
are fixated on. If you have ever seen a sky-writer at work, you would
know, even without setting foot in a real aircraft, that it is possible
to return to the same parcel of air and pass through the smoke you had
left previously.
On a calm day, no descending or climbing is required.
Your problem is your fixation on your assumptions, and then insisting
that physical reality must be wrong when your limited assumptions don't
square with that reality, a true sign of immaturity and a basic
inability to assimilate the information that your own senses provide.
Anthony, I'm actually beginning to feel sorry for you. I believe that
you have real, diagnosable mental issues.

Rip

"rq3" wrote in message
et...
Anthony, I'm actually beginning to feel sorry for you. I believe that you
have real, diagnosable mental issues.

I can assure you he does. He has proven it beyond a reasoanble doubt on far
too many occasions.

Maxwell wrote:
Anthony, I'm actually beginning to feel sorry for you. I believe that you
have real, diagnosable mental issues.

I can assure you he does. He has proven it beyond a reasoanble doubt on far
too many occasions.

And yet there are still over 50 posts in this thread encouraging his
behavior.

Good job guys. He owns you.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)

--
Message posted via AviationKB.com
http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200704/1

rq3 writes:

The wake consists of more than just the downwash you
are fixated on. If you have ever seen a sky-writer at work, you would
know, even without setting foot in a real aircraft, that it is possible
to return to the same parcel of air and pass through the smoke you had
left previously.

I never questioned that.

On a calm day, no descending or climbing is required.

How do you know? What skywriting have you done?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Mxsmanic wrote:
rq3 writes:


The wake consists of more than just the downwash you
are fixated on. If you have ever seen a sky-writer at work, you would
know, even without setting foot in a real aircraft, that it is possible
to return to the same parcel of air and pass through the smoke you had
left previously.


I never questioned that.


On a calm day, no descending or climbing is required.


How do you know? What skywriting have you done?

About 200 hours aerobatics with smoke. What skywriting have YOU done?

Rip

Rip writes:

About 200 hours aerobatics with smoke.

No skywriting?

What skywriting have YOU done?

None.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Rip writes:


About 200 hours aerobatics with smoke.


No skywriting?


What skywriting have YOU done?


None.

But you've sure blown a lot of smoke!
By the way, where's the reliable reference for the
"all wake descends" statement you made earlier?

Rip