A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Takeoff distances



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 20th 07, 05:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Kilo Charlie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 49
Default Takeoff distances


"CindyB" wrote in message
ups.com...
contributors to this thread. Despite all the pretty equations, they
ended up by saying
they didn't have enough consistent data, and that changes in weight
and wind made a
pot load of difference. Duh.

Any time it feels hinky .... fly dry, or find a longer, lower runway.
Racing be stuffed. I'd rather have my friends around for another
season.

Cindy B


Thanks for this link Cindy.....it does appear to be the only study available
to try to answer this question. Your conclusions are, as we say in the
scientific field, not supported by the data however. I didn't see this on a
google search prior to posting this question but maybe you're a more
experienced "googler" than I.

First of all re the weight....this is a quote from the study:
"The lines in Figure 11 seem to imply that the takeoff ground roll data were
not a function of weight, which is an absurd conclusion. This conclusion
further points to the danger of quick conclusions from data with lots of
scatter." So this would mean that the data are suspect to begin
with.....large amount of scatter and not enough points to be able to make
firm conclusions.

Re the wind this is another quote from the study:
"These lines should not be given a lot of weight, given the poor correlation
shown in Table 2." Again not a reliable set of data.

Having said this I may just have to agree with the post that said that there
are too many variables to be able to make firm conclusions other than to
rely upon experience. Too bad but thanks again for the article!

So how about some of those high density altitude pilots out there....any
"scary" tows? Do folks that routinely fly out of high DA fields always tow
dry? What kind of towplanes are being used?

Casey


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
measuring arm distances Heino & Deanne Weisberg Home Built 1 October 21st 05 05:49 PM
Stuck at work--need takeoff/landing distances for a 172 please Yossarian Piloting 12 July 14th 05 01:12 PM
Edge distances in steel Ed Wischmeyer Home Built 3 August 24th 04 10:53 PM
Are sectional paths correct across "long" distances? vincent p. norris General Aviation 32 March 25th 04 02:32 PM
Are sectional paths correct across "long" distances? vincent p. norris Piloting 36 March 25th 04 02:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.