![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I understand it, each base station is tracking the
cell phones it can hear and is alert for a hand-off. So the more base stations that a cell phone can be heard by, the more load on the network. Thus a cell phone in the air may put more load on the network than one on the ground. I don't know how significant this load is. As per the example of the mountain top repeater, I think that different base stations use different types of antennas depending on the surrounding terrain they are trying to cover. In flat areas the antennas have very horizontal propagation characteristics. You can see that if you watch your signal strength as you take off as a passenger from a flat terrain airport. It disappears after one or two thousand feet. But if you are flying over rougher terrain, say Telluride, the signal strength will be fine at 13,000 feet directly over the town or many miles from it, for example. Forest At 15:12 28 April 2007, Colin Lamb wrote: Eric hit it right on the button - about focusing. Gain is attained at the expense of directivity. The more gain, the further the signal transmits and receives and the less power required. Assuming the cell tower is at the same terrain height (or slightly higher), it will try to concentrate all of the power along the horizon. Any signal going upwards will mean less signal where people need it. If the antenna is designed correctly, your signal will decrease as your angle above the horizon increases. Directly above the cell tower would likely have a total null. That means that at altitude you will likely have the strongest signal from the cell tower furthest away - because it is the lower angle. Vhf omni-directional antennas have much less gain and directivity, so it is much less of a problem on the aircraft frequencies - but still can be an issue if you are directly over the station on the ground. I have seen repeater antennas on mountain tops near the town they want to cover actually invert the ground plane to provide better penetration into the town below. Colin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA phone survey? | [email protected][_1_] | Owning | 8 | March 26th 07 02:19 PM |
Fighter simulation game depicting a real MFD on your mobile phone? | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 23rd 05 05:20 AM |
AOPA urges allowing cell phone use in general aviation | Eric Greenwell | Soaring | 7 | March 30th 05 08:44 PM |
Vario Sound for my mobile phone | jorgie | Soaring | 1 | October 18th 04 04:21 PM |
FA: King KT96 Flight Phone | VC | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 13th 03 02:59 PM |