![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, Charlie Axilbund said:
So recently, a friend and I took a 172 to do some pattern work. We were out a little over an hour according to the Hobbes meter and our wris****ches, but the tach registered about half that. Now I've flown a That seems like an excessive difference. Our club charges by tach time, and the tach is calibrated for 2400 rpm. With an Archer in the pattern, I'm usually 2450 on climb out, 2000 on downwind, and 1600 on base and final. When I was training, I got about a 15-25% premium on days when all I did was pattern work. Now I fly mostly a Dakota and a Lance, and the rpm/mp chart on the back of the sun visor shows valid 65% power setting at 2200 or 2300 rpm for the altitudes I normally fly. That gives a tiny premium, but nowhere near what I got doing pattern work. -- Paul Tomblin http://blog.xcski.com/ My group's mission statement - 'You want *what* ? By *WHEN* ?' -- Simon Burr |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PA28: Difference in constant speed prop vs fixed pitch | Nathan Young | Owning | 25 | October 10th 04 04:41 AM |
Logging Time Consistently - Hobbs AND Tach | Carl Orton | Piloting | 11 | June 29th 04 09:52 PM |
First time airplane buyer, First time posting | Jessewright8 | Owning | 3 | June 3rd 04 02:08 PM |
Tach Vs. Hobbs Time | John Roncallo | Owning | 33 | January 7th 04 12:42 AM |
Next Time I Do Fabric Work on an Airplane | Larry Smith | Home Built | 11 | November 22nd 03 06:23 AM |