![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Morgans" wrote)
I was not able to find the exact page that I was looking for. I remember seeing a hangar that was a concrete dome, and had two doors, that were the same shape as the dome. They would stay in a down position, but rotate along the inside wall, thus taking up very little space. Here you go Jim. If you're a fast reader ....it shouldn't take you too long. g http://www.monolithic.com/gallery/commercial/hangar_door/index.html http://www.monolithic.com/gallery/commercial/mclad/index.html http://www.monolithic.com/gallery/commercial/hangars03/index.html http://www.monolithic.com/gallery/commercial/hangars/index.html http://www.monolithic.com/construction/index.html Much much much fun info in these links, too. Montblack |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Domes are simply cool.
I remember a proposal for a dome/carosel hangar that stored 8 aircraft. The aircraft were on a snowflake-like carosel made of 6" steel "C" channel that also guided the aircraft wheels as they were rolled in tail first. It rolled on the concrete floor with dozens of ball bearing urethane tired wheels and rotated about the center of the hangar. An owner would punch in his combination into the lock and the door would electrically open as the carosel rotated his aircraft into position to roll out of the hangar. It would have worked something like an airplane vending machine. The claim was made that this was significantly cheaper than T-hangers with the same ease of access to the airplanes. Cheaper because there was only one small door for 8 airplanes. Bill Daniels "Montblack" wrote in message ... ("Morgans" wrote) I was not able to find the exact page that I was looking for. I remember seeing a hangar that was a concrete dome, and had two doors, that were the same shape as the dome. They would stay in a down position, but rotate along the inside wall, thus taking up very little space. Here you go Jim. If you're a fast reader ....it shouldn't take you too long. g http://www.monolithic.com/gallery/commercial/hangar_door/index.html http://www.monolithic.com/gallery/commercial/mclad/index.html http://www.monolithic.com/gallery/commercial/hangars03/index.html http://www.monolithic.com/gallery/commercial/hangars/index.html http://www.monolithic.com/construction/index.html Much much much fun info in these links, too. Montblack |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Daniels" wrote Domes are simply cool. I remember a proposal for a dome/carosel hangar that stored 8 aircraft. The aircraft were on a snowflake-like carosel made of 6" steel "C" channel that also guided the aircraft wheels as they were rolled in tail first. It rolled on the concrete floor with dozens of ball bearing urethane tired wheels and rotated about the center of the hangar. An owner would punch in his combination into the lock and the door would electrically open as the carosel rotated his aircraft into position to roll out of the hangar. It would have worked something like an airplane vending machine. The claim was made that this was significantly cheaper than T-hangers with the same ease of access to the airplanes. Cheaper because there was only one small door for 8 airplanes. I can see that there could be a real economy of scale, in an arrangement like that. Since a dome large enough to hold 8 airplanes would be rather tall, it would seem like a second story would not be a large problem, either. It could become a great space for an EAA chapter to hold meetings, and have offices, and of course, rest rooms, since a rotating floor would not allow for that, unless they were built at the very center. A building of some type at the center would be a definite possibility, with the grid rotating around the central structure. I wonder how much such an arrangement would cost? Just a cost for the shell and a concrete floor would be interesting to know. -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Bill Daniels" wrote Domes are simply cool. I remember a proposal for a dome/carosel hangar that stored 8 aircraft. The aircraft were on a snowflake-like carosel made of 6" steel "C" channel that also guided the aircraft wheels as they were rolled in tail first. It rolled on the concrete floor with dozens of ball bearing urethane tired wheels and rotated about the center of the hangar. An owner would punch in his combination into the lock and the door would electrically open as the carosel rotated his aircraft into position to roll out of the hangar. It would have worked something like an airplane vending machine. The claim was made that this was significantly cheaper than T-hangers with the same ease of access to the airplanes. Cheaper because there was only one small door for 8 airplanes. I can see that there could be a real economy of scale, in an arrangement like that. Since a dome large enough to hold 8 airplanes would be rather tall, it would seem like a second story would not be a large problem, either. Monolithic domes need not be spheres - they can be oblate spheroids therefore not as tall. A 2nd story could really be nice though. It could become a great space for an EAA chapter to hold meetings, and have offices, and of course, rest rooms, since a rotating floor would not allow for that, unless they were built at the very center. A building of some type at the center would be a definite possibility, with the grid rotating around the central structure. Actually, the floor doesn't rotate, just a spider frame made of 6" channels. An additional suggestion was made to make each airplane position slightly uphill so the airplane would roll out of the hangar powered by gravity. An electric winch attached to the tail tiedown point would pull it back in - and allow it to slowly roll out. I wonder how much such an arrangement would cost? Just a cost for the shell and a concrete floor would be interesting to know. -- Call one of the dome vendors for an estimate. Bill Daniels |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Daniels" wrote Monolithic domes need not be spheres - they can be oblate spheroids therefore not as tall. True, but to give strength to the roof, (the curve is needed) in a large enough building to house 8 airplanes, it will still be high enough to put a second story in, I would think. The truss type floor could be supported by the walls of the dome and a load bearing structure in the middle. Otherwise, the truss would have to be wicked strong, and that means tall. Actually, the floor doesn't rotate, just a spider frame made of 6" channels. Right, but there can not be any permenant structures in the arc of the moving channels, or the channels could not move past them. There could be a structure in the middle, with the frames rotating around it, much like a "merry-go-round." -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Daniels" wrote The claim was made that this was significantly cheaper than T-hangers with the same ease of access to the airplanes. Cheaper because there was only one small door for 8 airplanes. It would also tend to lend itself to situations where there is a limited area for a taxiway, or access to the ramp. Less taxiway surface area to the entrance would be another reason to expect some cost savings. OK, I'm sold. Who is in for setting up a limited partnership for designing and building hangars like this all over the country? g The strange thing is, I'm about half serious. Humm. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
3D design | island life | Rotorcraft | 4 | October 23rd 05 01:31 AM |
DR-107 One Design | [email protected] | Aerobatics | 0 | October 12th 05 09:45 PM |
3D design | island life | Rotorcraft | 0 | September 13th 05 02:36 PM |
old gyrocopter design? | E. Glaser | Rotorcraft | 1 | August 9th 05 03:52 AM |
Strop design | Edward Weaver | Soaring | 3 | July 20th 05 06:03 PM |