![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jose" wrote in message t... They pull those wings up at the tips, no? No. Not in the test I saw. They pull up at various points along the wing, simulating normal wing loading. This might be the test you recall Jose. I would have to agree it was hardly a pin-point failure, and certainly not at the root. Seems to be a pretty good example of a well designed wing. http://youtube.com/watch?v=6Uo0C01Fwb8 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This might be the test you recall Jose. I would have to agree it was hardly
a pin-point failure, and certainly not at the root. Seems to be a pretty good example of a well designed wing. http://youtube.com/watch?v=6Uo0C01Fwb8 No, this wasn't it. What I recall (IIRC) was in German - maybe it was an Airbus wing. There were three views, I thought I had them on my hard drive but alas, I don't. Nonetheless, this one is similar in that the failure happened all at once, all over. Jose -- Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe, except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
This might be the test you recall Jose. I would have to agree it was hardly a pin-point failure, and certainly not at the root. Seems to be a pretty good example of a well designed wing. http://youtube.com/watch?v=6Uo0C01Fwb8 No, this wasn't it. What I recall (IIRC) was in German - maybe it was an Airbus wing. There were three views, I thought I had them on my hard drive but alas, I don't. Nonetheless, this one is similar in that the failure happened all at once, all over. Jose You need glasses and a hearing aid. At about the 3:27 point the wing is clearly shown with a kink at one point and the narrator says that the other wing failed at the same LOCATION (not locations) but wasn't visible. Sure, some of the skin flew off above the failure point, but the entire wing didn't even come close to a uniform failure. Matt |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... You need glasses and a hearing aid. At about the 3:27 point the wing is clearly shown with a kink at one point and the narrator says that the other wing failed at the same LOCATION (not locations) but wasn't visible. Sure, some of the skin flew off above the failure point, but the entire wing didn't even come close to a uniform failure. It clearly didn't fail at a single location, and certainly not the root like you predicted, your trollyness. Go away, you are starting to sound like MX in drag. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
lowrance 500 opinion | d&tm | Piloting | 2 | March 17th 07 06:57 AM |
Your opinion about helmets? | Dave Russell | Aerobatics | 8 | March 13th 04 02:32 PM |
Opinion on the lowrance airmap 500 | Pascal Duchemin | Products | 4 | February 24th 04 09:26 PM |
Opinion on club share | Paul Folbrecht | Owning | 10 | January 8th 04 05:17 AM |
Opinion on this please | Frederick Wilson | Home Built | 11 | December 24th 03 06:01 PM |