A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FAA On User Fees: "The piston thing is not going to happen." Divide And Conquer?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 15th 07, 10:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default FAA On User Fees: "The piston thing is not going to happen." Divide And Conquer?


Given this FAA justification for implementing NextGen ATC
privatization:

NextGen is not only necessary to accommodate increased levels of
commercial travel, but also to meet the growth in new types of air
travel that are taking the skies. We are expecting a surge in
traffic from a new generation aircraft called Very Light Jets
(VLJs). These high-performance jets are inexpensive and will be
able to land just about anywhere. Commercial Space is another new
market well under way that the must be accommodated in our air
transportation system.

I fail to see how VLJs specifically are an issue. Isn't it a
projected increase in the number of aircraft concurrently in the NAS
that is the perceived problem? Hell, if the thousands of BD-5s that
that charlatan-Jim had sold had actually been built, the NAS would
have reached grid lock conditions back in the '70s.

VLJs are just airplanes. What is the FAA afraid of, a massive
increase in Part 135 ops?

  #2  
Old May 15th 07, 10:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Stewart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 437
Default FAA On User Fees: "The piston thing is not going to happen."Divide And Conquer?

Larry Dighera wrote:
Given this FAA justification for implementing NextGen ATC
privatization:

NextGen is not only necessary to accommodate increased levels of
commercial travel, but also to meet the growth in new types of air
travel that are taking the skies. We are expecting a surge in
traffic from a new generation aircraft called Very Light Jets
(VLJs). These high-performance jets are inexpensive and will be
able to land just about anywhere. Commercial Space is another new
market well under way that the must be accommodated in our air
transportation system.

I fail to see how VLJs specifically are an issue. Isn't it a
projected increase in the number of aircraft concurrently in the NAS
that is the perceived problem? Hell, if the thousands of BD-5s that
that charlatan-Jim had sold had actually been built, the NAS would
have reached grid lock conditions back in the '70s.

VLJs are just airplanes. What is the FAA afraid of, a massive
increase in Part 135 ops?


They aren't afraid of anything. They are just
using a free-market success story to justify their
spending plan. If someone paid me to write their
propaganda, I'd say the same thing. That is, if
I could stand writing propaganda....


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
User Fees Will Tripple Piston-Engine Operating Costs Larry Dighera Piloting 3 March 10th 07 07:29 PM
Old polish aircraft TS-8 "Bies" ("Bogy") - for sale >pk Aviation Marketplace 0 October 16th 06 07:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.