![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Maxwell writes: Obviously,,, but it still has "zip" to do with reducing power to avoid accelerating excessively in the dive. Accelerating excessively would destroy the zero-G trajectory. Has "zip" to do with the subject at hand. Learn to read. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uhh..hate to burst your bubble again, but -1 g would have you straining at
your seatbelt with a force of 1 g. If you're not wearing one, you would be exerting 1 g against the roof. mike "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... JGalban via AviationKB.com writes: That's what I do. Keeps me from accelerating excessively in the dive. Your acceleration is fixed in a parabola. It is always exactly -1.0 G, which precisely negates the pull of gravity and gives you the zero gravity objective. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sure he meant to reduce power in order to not exceed Vne.
mike "Maxwell" wrote in message m... "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... A zero-G parabola is a ballistic trajectory; it always involves acceleration towards the ground (in the direction of gravity) at exactly 1.0 G. That's how it produces the "zero-G" effect. This being so, you cannot change the acceleration of the aircraft along the vertical axis without losing the zero-G effect. Essentially, if you fire a cannonball next to the aircraft, your aircraft needs to follow the same path as the cannonball in order to become "weightless." Obviously,,, but it still has "zip" to do with reducing power to avoid accelerating excessively in the dive. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mike regish writes:
I'm sure he meant to reduce power in order to not exceed Vne. You reach Vne quickly in a parabola. Remember, you have to accelerate downwards at 1 G in order to maintain the zero-G state. In five seconds your rate of descent from the top of the parabola must be 9600 fpm, or 95 kts _straight down_ (and thus much faster if you are also moving forward). -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mike regish writes:
Uhh..hate to burst your bubble again, but -1 g would have you straining at your seatbelt with a force of 1 g. +1 G plus -1 G equals 0 G. In the zero-G state, you're accelerating downward at 1 G, thus -1 G vertically. Since the acceleration due to gravity is +1 G, they cancel, and the result is weightlessness. If you're not wearing one, you would be exerting 1 g against the roof. You'll want to heavily pad the entire cabin, anyway, since the return to the 1 G state (and often higher than that, since you must pull out of the parabola) can be abrupt. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... mike regish writes: Uhh..hate to burst your bubble again, but -1 g would have you straining at your seatbelt with a force of 1 g. +1 G plus -1 G equals 0 G. In the zero-G state, you're accelerating downward at 1 G, thus -1 G vertically. Since the acceleration due to gravity is +1 G, they cancel, and the result is weightlessness. You're accelerating downward at exactly 1 g, or 32 feet per second per second. Zero g is zero g. If you're not wearing one, you would be exerting 1 g against the roof. You'll want to heavily pad the entire cabin, anyway, since the return to the 1 G state (and often higher than that, since you must pull out of the parabola) can be abrupt. My seat belt can hold me in quite nicely at zero g. Even at -1 g, which would have me exerting a 1 g force against the belt. I'm not flying the freakin' vomit comet. I'm in a freakin' Tripacer and we're all strapped in. Again...1 g is straight and level. Zero g is downward acceleration at 32 feet per second per second. -1 g is downward acceleration at 64 feet per second per second. mike (I've done it already...in a real plane...just wanted to know how to do it longer...which I now know how to do thanks to info from a real pilot) regish P.S. I don't think I'm going to defend you against your flame club anymore. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: mike regish writes: Uhh..hate to burst your bubble again, but -1 g would have you straining at your seatbelt with a force of 1 g. +1 G plus -1 G equals 0 G. In the zero-G state, you're accelerating downward at 1 G, thus -1 G vertically. Since the acceleration due to gravity is +1 G, they cancel, and the result is weightlessness. Nope, you're anm idiot. Bertie |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: mike regish writes: I'm sure he meant to reduce power in order to not exceed Vne. You reach Vne quickly in a parabola. No, you don't moron Bertie |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Maxwell writes: Obviously,,, but it still has "zip" to do with reducing power to avoid accelerating excessively in the dive. Accelerating excessively would destroy the zero-G trajectory. You;re an idiot. Bertie |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: JGalban via AviationKB.com writes: That's what I do. Keeps me from accelerating excessively in the dive. Your acceleration is fixed in a parabola. No, it isn't Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Saturn V Typical Mission Profile 9903826.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 12th 07 01:37 AM |
ASW27 wing profile templates | basils27 | Soaring | 0 | June 29th 05 11:46 AM |
Looking for 3/8 in-24 thread/low profile self locking nuts/ | Larry | Home Built | 3 | February 23rd 05 03:56 PM |
Looking for 3/8 in-24 thread/low profile self locking nuts/ | Larry | Home Built | 3 | February 22nd 05 03:02 PM |
Aviation Profile Prints for sale | Chris Banyai-Riepl | Military Aviation | 0 | July 7th 04 04:48 AM |