![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "karl gruber" wrote FADEC won't make an engine run more efficiently. It will make it easier to manage. In a way that is true, but at the same time it is as false as can be. A properly leaned engine at cruise, with well matched injectors, will have all of the cylinders humming happily along at the most efficient setting, and lowest fuel flow. FADEC can not improve on that much, if any. But, and it is a big but, think of the settings we run on takeoff, and landing (in case you have to do a go-around) and of the time you are at idle, or low power on the ground. You are running much richer than need be, and not as lean as FADEC would have things set. On the average, us setting the mixture is wasting fuel, and is inefficient as compared to FADEC. FADEC will reset the mixture many times per second; as often as is needed. That is something we can never begin to think about doing. -- Jim in NC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But, and it is a big but, think of the settings we run on takeoff, and
landing (in case you have to do a go-around) and of the time you are at idle, or low power on the ground. Most of the time will be spent at cruise (unless you are in the pattern), so I would not expect that to be all that much. Jose -- There are two kinds of people in the world. Those that just want to know what button to push, and those that want to know what happens when they push the button. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jose wrote: But, and it is a big but, think of the settings we run on takeoff, and landing (in case you have to do a go-around) and of the time you are at idle, or low power on the ground. Most of the time will be spent at cruise (unless you are in the pattern), so I would not expect that to be all that much. A FADEC on a plane like a 182 will save on average 2 GPH, that's huge. So saying a FADEC in and of itself is not what makes it more efficient is theoretically true but it is practically true. A human will never be able to operate the engine at its most efficient, for a computer it is simple. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FADEC is much more than just controlling mixture. that system is measuring,
monitoring and governing a whole lot of parameters. compared to a human operating a few levers, FADEC can set all these parameters in a way so the engine/propeller-combination operates much closer to its optimum. also, today's engines can only be that economic because of the electronic system. as an example, fuel injection varies in injection time and the amount of fuel injected, depending on RPMs, power setting, flow of the mass of air through the manifold (not just the air pressure in there) and probably a few more. you cannot achieve this by mechanical or even maunual solutions. uli Morgans wrote: A properly leaned engine at cruise, with well matched injectors, will have all of the cylinders humming happily along at the most efficient setting, and lowest fuel flow. FADEC can not improve on that much, if any. But, and it is a big but, think of the settings we run on takeoff, and landing (in case you have to do a go-around) and of the time you are at idle, or low power on the ground. You are running much richer than need be, and not as lean as FADEC would have things set. On the average, us setting the mixture is wasting fuel, and is inefficient as compared to FADEC. FADEC will reset the mixture many times per second; as often as is needed. That is something we can never begin to think about doing. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Uli" wrote FADEC is much more than just controlling mixture. that system is measuring, monitoring and governing a whole lot of parameters. compared to a human operating a few levers, FADEC can set all these parameters in a way so the engine/propeller-combination operates much closer to its optimum. also, today's engines can only be that economic because of the electronic system. as an example, fuel injection varies in injection time and the amount of fuel injected, depending on RPMs, power setting, flow of the mass of air through the manifold (not just the air pressure in there) and probably a few more. you cannot achieve this by mechanical or even maunual solutions. Of course it does much more, but the mixture is a big part of the equation. One thing you missed mentioning is the timing, on some systems. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cost of owning a Diamond DA40, new vs 5-6 years old | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | December 28th 10 05:00 AM |
Diamond DA40 lap belt extender ... ? | Harold | Owning | 2 | July 22nd 06 05:56 PM |
Diamond DA40-180 | lance smith | Piloting | 9 | December 4th 03 04:00 PM |
Diesel engines for Planes Yahoo Group Jodel Diesel is Isuzu Citroen Peugeot | Roland M | Home Built | 3 | September 13th 03 12:44 AM |
Diesel engines for Planes Yahoo Group Jodel Diesel is Isuzu Citroen Peugeot | Roland M | General Aviation | 2 | September 13th 03 12:44 AM |