![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 25, 6:49 pm, "Douglas Paterson"
wrote: I'm sure the experienced buyers & sellers around here have run into this before.... One prospective plane I'm looking at is for sale in Connecticut (currently based there). The current ownership is in a Delaware LLC (of a sole proprietor, who is flying/basing the plane out of CT). Connecticut has 6% sales tax that apparently applies to even "casual and isolated sales" of aircraft; Delaware has no sales tax. I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to decide which I find more appealing.... ![]() So, "where" does this airplane sale take place? Is it wherever the keys get handed to me? Is it DE, since that's where the owning entity exists? CT, since that's where the plane's based? Whatever we write in a purchase agreement? Separate but related question: Colorado is where I live--BUT, I'm here on active duty military orders, and my official state of residence is Oregon. It says so in my military records, any state income tax purposes are with OR, my motor vehicles are registered in OR, I have an OR driver license, I vote in OR. I've read AOPA's discussion about Soldiers' and Sailors' Relief Act *not* applying to aircraft based in the state of assignment, but I wonder if that's the whole story? Does anyone know more details on that, ways to avoid paying CO's 2.9% "use" tax (what a crock!), etc? 2.9% sure beats 6%, but it's not nearly as good as the 0% that OR would want. Is there some way to register my plane in OR and avoid CO's sticky fingers? I haven't paid sales taxes on any sort of big-ticket item before, except for the time I was foolish enough to register a car in Florida--this is killing me!! ![]() Any magic bullets?? I seem to recall the discussion here a couple of weeks ago concluded that there's no advantage to an LLC ownership construct for a single person & personal use (i.e., me)--would that help me here at all? As usual, thanks for any help or advice! -- Doug "Where am I to go/Now that I've gone too far?" -- Golden Earring, "Twilight Zone" (my email is spam-proofed; read the address and make the appropriate change to contact me) For the purpose of "use tax" where the sale takes place (or where you residence is) makes no difference. If you bring the plane into the state to keep it there (with a few exceptions) you owe "use tax". In many states (certainly in California (what I know)) you can put your LLC anywhere in the world you want but if the LLC does *ANY* business or holds any assets physically in California, you owe $800/yr in franchise tax on the LLC (not even counting the airplane). I guess I only know California though, check your local state for "franchise tax" on the LLC. -Robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
ups.com... For the purpose of "use tax" where the sale takes place (or where you residence is) makes no difference. If you bring the plane into the state to keep it there (with a few exceptions) you owe "use tax". In many states (certainly in California (what I know)) you can put your LLC anywhere in the world you want but if the LLC does *ANY* business or holds any assets physically in California, you owe $800/yr in franchise tax on the LLC (not even counting the airplane). I guess I only know California though, check your local state for "franchise tax" on the LLC. Robert: Thanks for the thoughts. I think, though, that you may have confused my 1st & 2nd questions. Assuming there's nothing I can do to avoid CO's _use_ tax (grrrrr), it's still well worth my while to structure the sale (if legally possible) to avoid CT's _sales_ tax (because it's 3.1 percentage points higher than CO's _use_ tax). In that case, I think where the sale takes place DOES make a difference--no?? As to the _use_ tax, sad to say that I think you're correct that I'm stuck there. Seems like, even if I'd bought a plane years ago, they could sock that to me upon moving to the state. Gotta love the language: it's a tax on the "privilege" of the use of personal property. Enjoying the use of legally acquired property [paid for with after-tax dollars outside of the state, I might add] is a "privilege," eh...? Grrrrr.... I suppose I should be thankful that the tax collector's not in my house inventorying my furniture, clothes, computer, and everything else, since the language certainly includes all personal property! -- Doug "Where am I to go/Now that I've gone too far?" -- Golden Earring, "Twilight Zone" (my email is spam-proofed; read the address and make the appropriate change to contact me) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tie-down and Taxes | 309 | Soaring | 4 | January 28th 07 09:46 PM |
sales/property taxes | John Doe | Owning | 14 | October 21st 05 03:41 AM |
For sale:1933 Avro 626 and 637 Aeroplane Sales Catalogues | sam | Military Aviation | 0 | July 9th 04 05:52 AM |
For sale:1933 Avro 626 and 637 Aeroplane Sales Catalogues | sam | Restoration | 0 | July 9th 04 05:43 AM |
What determines LNAV "circling mode"? | Jack | Soaring | 11 | November 20th 03 05:15 AM |