A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Russia joins France and Germany



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 7th 03, 12:09 AM
captain!
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Michael Petukhov" wrote in message
om...
"captain!" wrote in message

a...
"Michael Petukhov" wrote in message

it is not true. 90% of chechens voted to be normal part of russia
in a recent referendum. Although difficult there is a political
solution for chechenya as a part of russia. What we see now is
final stages of war actions in that area. Can you say the same for
US in Iraq? Money does not solve all problems, Captain. Never did.

Michael


i was not refering to the present time. what about when the war was

still
young?the russian govt. routinely tried to make the situation seem

better
than it was, just like the americans are now, and just like every

country
does.


Oh in that sense... Well not only russians and americans.


the iraqis did it too. it was also funny to see the iraqi defense minister
claiming that the americans were nowhere near bagdad while bombs were
falling in the background.


human nature I guess... I just finished reading very fresh book
on battle of Kursk with first published german and soviet
official military reports before, during and after
that final german disaster in east front. Very funny reading.
Imagine soviet reports were much much more closer to the reality.
while according to german reports all these disasters after
disaters were just fine well planed operations with excellent
output. The book includes also Soviet and German newspaper
papers published in that time on that matters. German
materials were just nothing more than **** propaganda. Although
soviet press publications also included highly overestimated
numbers for German losses but generally the picture of
the events was pretty close to real one as we know it now.
So it seems there are problems with Stalin standard legend of
****ty propaganda.


are you saying that there was ****ty propaganda about stalin or that stalin
had problems with (writing) ****ty propaganda?


Michael



  #2  
Old September 7th 03, 08:57 AM
Michael Petukhov
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"captain!" wrote in message .ca...

human nature I guess... I just finished reading very fresh book
on battle of Kursk with first published german and soviet
official military reports before, during and after
that final german disaster in east front. Very funny reading.
Imagine soviet reports were much much more closer to the reality.
while according to german reports all these disasters after
disaters were just fine well planed operations with excellent
output. The book includes also Soviet and German newspaper
papers published in that time on that matters. German
materials were just nothing more than **** propaganda. Although
soviet press publications also included highly overestimated
numbers for German losses but generally the picture of
the events was pretty close to real one as we know it now.
So it seems there are problems with Stalin standard legend of
****ty propaganda.


are you saying that there was ****ty propaganda about stalin or that stalin
had problems with (writing) ****ty propaganda?


Difficult to say... Although there is little doubt that in
Stalin times soviet press often lied and generaly was used
for propaganda. Where it was (and is) not? But clearly the
picture was more complex than that simplistic views. Stalin
is known to severely purnish those who lied to him. As result of
that intentional lie in a official reports in his times
was very rare. particularly war time reports of Red Army
general stuff are considered to be the most complete and
reliable source of data for WWII in east front by many
serious reserachers including also western historians.
David Glantz for instance noted that very clearly. As for press
it lied if there was a good purpose and a direct order but
simulteniously if there were no good reason and durect
order to lie it could also be quite trueful. So as usual
one have to look in details and from different prespectives
and sources to find out what was the true. For insance
I would like that modern russian press provide the same
quality of materials about Chechenya war as it was done
by "Red Star" newspaper in 1943 about battle of Kursk.
So it is simple lie to say that soviet press lied all the
time on all matters.

Michael



Michael

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
War books from Germany FYI Only ArtKramr Military Aviation 0 July 31st 03 02:54 AM
Chirac lost JD Military Aviation 7 July 26th 03 06:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.