![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 31, 8:05 am, Jay Honeck wrote:
"The good news: the number of GA accidents in 2006 declined to 1,515 from the 1,669 accidente in 2005. The bad news: The NTSB reports that part of the decline was due to the steady decrease in the amount of GA activity. Since 1990, says the Safety Board, GA hours flown each year have declined, totalling a 20% drop". Just look at the drops of avgas consumption: http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/a403600001m.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just look at the drops of avgas consumption:
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/a403600001m.htm Oh, my God. That is incredible. And awful. I wonder if those sales figures from the 1980s included military aircraft? There used to be lots of military hardware burning avgas -- not any more... If not? Holy moley...GA really is dead. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 31, 8:29 pm, Jay Honeck wrote:
I wonder if those sales figures from the 1980s included military aircraft? There used to be lots of military hardware burning avgas -- not any more... I don't think the Military had active duty piston engine aircrafts in the 1980s. It was all GA. If not? Holy moley...GA really is dead. If ethanol-compatible mogas burning LSAs don't catch on in the next few years, then you're right. Piston powered GA doesn't have much future left. I consider myself the last generation of piston GA flyers, and I'm putting 200hr a year right now on my mogas burning Grumman to catch some last epic flying. One day I'll probably hang up my wings, at least I'll have a thousand or two hours of flying memory to remember. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
M wrote: On May 31, 8:29 pm, Jay Honeck wrote: I wonder if those sales figures from the 1980s included military aircraft? There used to be lots of military hardware burning avgas -- not any more... I don't think the Military had active duty piston engine aircrafts in the 1980s. It was all GA. One thing to consider is old frieght dogs changing from piston powered beasts to turbine monsters. A Twin Beech or DC-3 burns quite a bit of fuel. One stat I've seen, but can't source right now, is that $bignum percent of piston engines could run on a 95UL fuel (basically a super premium blend of mogas), but the majority of avgas burnt goes into the $smallnum percent of engines that can't burn 95UL and need 100 octane. I wonder if that stat is still true, with there being a lot less big piston aircraft out there now. John -- John Clear - http://www.clear-prop.org/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good point. and the aerial applicators as well.
Jim "John Clear" wrote in message ... In article .com, M wrote: On May 31, 8:29 pm, Jay Honeck wrote: I wonder if those sales figures from the 1980s included military aircraft? There used to be lots of military hardware burning avgas -- not any more... I don't think the Military had active duty piston engine aircrafts in the 1980s. It was all GA. One thing to consider is old frieght dogs changing from piston powered beasts to turbine monsters. A Twin Beech or DC-3 burns quite a bit of fuel. One stat I've seen, but can't source right now, is that $bignum percent of piston engines could run on a 95UL fuel (basically a super premium blend of mogas), but the majority of avgas burnt goes into the $smallnum percent of engines that can't burn 95UL and need 100 octane. I wonder if that stat is still true, with there being a lot less big piston aircraft out there now. John -- John Clear - http://www.clear-prop.org/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well most of the LSAs out there only burn 4 to 6 gph of auto gas. Sun n Fun
was jammed full of LSAs this year. Have a good day and stay out of the trees! See ya on Sport Aircraft group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/ "M" wrote in message On May 31, 8:29 pm, Jay Honeck wrote: I wonder if those sales figures from the 1980s included military aircraft? There used to be lots of military hardware burning avgas -- not any more... I don't think the Military had active duty piston engine aircrafts in the 1980s. It was all GA. If not? Holy moley...GA really is dead. If ethanol-compatible mogas burning LSAs don't catch on in the next few years, then you're right. Piston powered GA doesn't have much future left. I consider myself the last generation of piston GA flyers, and I'm putting 200hr a year right now on my mogas burning Grumman to catch some last epic flying. One day I'll probably hang up my wings, at least I'll have a thousand or two hours of flying memory to remember. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote Oh, my God. That is incredible. And awful. I wonder if those sales figures from the 1980s included military aircraft? There used to be lots of military hardware burning avgas -- not any more... If not? Holy moley...GA really is dead. But, don't forget. There is a hell of a lot of mogas being burned now, where there was mostly all avgas being used, back then. -- Jim in NC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 31, 9:31 pm, "Morgans" wrote:
But, don't forget. There is a hell of a lot of mogas being burned now, where there was mostly all avgas being used, back then. I wonder if there's any statistics on this. I know I'm burning mogas in my plane like no tomorrow. It's a psychological thing, like reverse commute and watching people stuck on the freeway in the opposite direction. Mogas at AWO is $3.81 right now, but compared to 100LL's $4.82 it's a steal, and I can't fly enough of it before it'll go even higher next year. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Just look at the drops of avgas consumption: http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/a403600001m.htm Oh, my God. That is incredible. And awful. I wonder if those sales figures from the 1980s included military aircraft? There used to be lots of military hardware burning avgas -- not any more... If not? Holy moley...GA really is dead. I don't think many military airplanes have used avgas since 2000, and the drop since this is still very dramatic. I won't say GA is dead, but it certainly is very sick. I'm looking at BMW motorcycles this weekend, having decided I simply can't afford an airplane of the capability I really need to be useful (Skylane or better) and the inconvenience of he nearest airport with hangars being 45 minutes away. If I buy a new bike, I'll probably drop my flying club membership and ride. Matt |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think many military airplanes have used avgas since 2000, and
the drop since this is still very dramatic. I won't say GA is dead, but it certainly is very sick. I'm looking at BMW motorcycles this weekend, having decided I simply can't afford an airplane of the capability I really need to be useful (Skylane or better) and the inconvenience of he nearest airport with hangars being 45 minutes away. If I buy a new bike, I'll probably drop my flying club membership and ride. Don't get me wrong -- riding is great. (Just got my Goldwing out of winter storage last weekend.) But it ain't flying... Nothing is. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flying Magazine's Instrument Flying 1973 | Steven P. McNicoll | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | January 12th 04 03:50 PM |
Flying Magazine's Instrument Flying 1973 | Steven P. McNicoll | Aviation Marketplace | 9 | January 4th 04 02:24 AM |
Flying Magazine's Instrument Flying 1973 | Steven P. McNicoll | General Aviation | 9 | January 4th 04 02:24 AM |
Flying Magazine's Instrument Flying 1973 | Steven P. McNicoll | Products | 9 | January 4th 04 02:24 AM |
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 12:07 AM |