ACLU sues Jeppesen for Flights

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...
gatt wrote:
Normally I don't have a problem with the intent of the ACLU...they
champion the underdogs that most people hate, simply because some
underdog someday might be worthy of a champion. (The civil rights
movement comes to mind.)

Absolute BULL****. Dig into their origins and find what a fraud they were
and pretty much still are (past their sedate PR crap).

But...


My problem with the ACLU is they promote themselves as defenders of the
Bill of Rights. Yet they are very selective of what rights they defend.

Which is emblematic of their origins, and their original (and even today)
purpose.

I suspect you DO know what they were, don't you?

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

Normally I don't have a problem with the intent of the ACLU...they
champion the underdogs that most people hate, simply because some
underdog someday might be worthy of a champion. (The civil rights
movement comes to mind.)

Absolute BULL****.

Okay. I guess we're done here.

Which is emblematic of their origins, and their original (and even today)
purpose.

I suspect you DO know what they were, don't you?

Oh jesus, you're not going to start spouting "Red Scare" crap are you?
Spare us. Communism (on a large scale) is dead.

--
Message posted via AviationKB.com
http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200706/1

Kloudy via AviationKB.com wrote:
Which is emblematic of their origins, and their original (and even
today) purpose.

I suspect you DO know what they were, don't you?

Oh jesus, you're not going to start spouting "Red Scare" crap are you?
Spare us. Communism (on a large scale) is dead.

But those that support socialism and would like to see it in place in this
country are, unfortunately, not.

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:


But those that support socialism and would like to see it in place in this
country are, unfortunately, not.

Nor are those intent on a christian theocracy.

--
Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com

Kloudy via AviationKB.com wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:


But those that support socialism and would like to see it in place
in this country are, unfortunately, not.

Nor are those intent on a christian theocracy.

I don't support them either. As a matter of fact I'd place them on pretty
equal levels of "not a good thingness."

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:


Nor are those intent on a christian theocracy.

I don't support them either. As a matter of fact I'd place them on pretty
equal levels of "not a good thingness."

Sorry. I didn't really mean to imply that you did. I was trying to create
that sense of often parallel, extreme ideologies that are, as you say, "not a
good thingness"

--
Message posted via AviationKB.com
http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200706/1

"Kloudy via AviationKB.com" u33403@uwe wrote in message
news:7342b4da783d0@uwe...
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:


Nor are those intent on a christian theocracy.

I don't support them either. As a matter of fact I'd place them on pretty
equal levels of "not a good thingness."

Sorry. I didn't really mean to imply that you did. I was trying to create
that sense of often parallel, extreme ideologies that are, as you say,
"not a
good thingness"


Extreme ideologies...like liberty?

I mean the real thing, not the current Republicrat collectivism/statism
thing.

On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:31:02 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in
:

Kloudy via AviationKB.com wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:


But those that support socialism and would like to see it in place
in this country are, unfortunately, not.

Nor are those intent on a christian theocracy.

I don't support them either. As a matter of fact I'd place them on pretty
equal levels of "not a good thingness."


http://www.slate.com/id/2165033/entry/2165035/
I do not think it is arrogant of me to claim that I had already
discovered these four objections (as well as noticed the more
vulgar and obvious fact that religion is used by those in temporal
charge to invest themselves with authority) before my boyish voice
had broken.

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...
Kloudy via AviationKB.com wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:


But those that support socialism and would like to see it in place
in this country are, unfortunately, not.

Nor are those intent on a christian theocracy.

I don't support them either. As a matter of fact I'd place them on pretty
equal levels of "not a good thingness."

"Goofy bastiges" in my book.