A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

State of the Art, 1963



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 9th 03, 02:36 AM
Charles Talleyrand
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Marron" wrote in message news
Basically, how does the combat go?


How many angels can dance on the head of a pin? Likely no
different than how the Japanese Zero's did against F-14's
in the 1980 movie, "The Final Countdown," starring Kirk Douglas,
Martin Sheen, Katharine Ross, and the nuclear aircraft carrier
USS Nimitz.


The F-4 never even sees the enemy? It should see the enemy from
30 miles away unless someone jams them, and most F-18s don't
have jamming ability (I think).


  #2  
Old September 9th 03, 11:25 PM
Paul J. Adam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Charles Talleyrand
writes
"Mike Marron" wrote in
message news
How many angels can dance on the head of a pin? Likely no
different than how the Japanese Zero's did against F-14's
in the 1980 movie, "The Final Countdown," starring Kirk Douglas,
Martin Sheen, Katharine Ross, and the nuclear aircraft carrier
USS Nimitz.


The F-4 never even sees the enemy? It should see the enemy from
30 miles away unless someone jams them, and most F-18s don't
have jamming ability (I think).


What pods are the F/A-18s carrying, and/or who's escorting it?

30 miles head-on is well inside the published AMRAAM envelope: by the
time the F-4s see the enemy, they've already got missiles inbound (but
are still well outside published Sparrow range, even head-on).

Would _you_ assume that the difficult blips on your radar were some sort
of time-travelling superfighter? Even if you did, what could you do?



--
When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite.
W S Churchill

Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk
  #3  
Old September 10th 03, 04:19 AM
Charles Talleyrand
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Paul J. Adam" wrote in message ...
The F-4 never even sees the enemy? It should see the enemy from
30 miles away unless someone jams them, and most F-18s don't
have jamming ability (I think).


What pods are the F/A-18s carrying, and/or who's escorting it?

30 miles head-on is well inside the published AMRAAM envelope: by the
time the F-4s see the enemy, they've already got missiles inbound (but
are still well outside published Sparrow range, even head-on).

Would _you_ assume that the difficult blips on your radar were some sort
of time-travelling superfighter? Even if you did, what could you do?


I would likely die. I would rather eject. Maybe utrning tail and running
would work????? But it's bad all the way.

My question is .. do the F-4s see the F-18s or the incoming missiles at all?
Sure, they lose the battle but do they even see (on radar) the enemy at all.
I'm pretty sure the answer is "no" if the F-18s come in low, so what
if the F-18s come in high?


  #4  
Old September 10th 03, 10:42 PM
Paul J. Adam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Charles Talleyrand
writes
"Paul J. Adam" wrote in message
...
What pods are the F/A-18s carrying, and/or who's escorting it?

30 miles head-on is well inside the published AMRAAM envelope: by the
time the F-4s see the enemy, they've already got missiles inbound (but
are still well outside published Sparrow range, even head-on).

Would _you_ assume that the difficult blips on your radar were some sort
of time-travelling superfighter? Even if you did, what could you do?


I would likely die. I would rather eject. Maybe utrning tail and running
would work????? But it's bad all the way.

My question is .. do the F-4s see the F-18s or the incoming missiles at all?


Not the missiles. The aircraft... don't know. Depends on lots of issues
(which model of Hornet? The -E is sneakier, especially head-on). Are the
Phantoms looking up or down? Do they have any idea at all there's a
threat?

Early Phantoms, I'll say they won't see the missiles, might maybe see
the Hornets, but wouldn't want to bet on it.


Reaching here (not used early Phantom radar) I'd guess the F-4s might
pick up fast small inbounds, which then turn away outside Sparrow range:
first guess is enemy threat avoiding the Sparrow shot rather than
closing to fight. No launch indications they'd recognise and the threats
are evading; and if the AMRAAMs even set off the F-4's RWRs when they go
active the Phantoms are looking for a pop-up fighter threat, not
starting missile evasion.

It's bad news for the F-4s, AFAIK.


--
When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite.
W S Churchill

Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk
  #5  
Old September 10th 03, 03:45 AM
Cory Miller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message
...

"Mike Marron" wrote in message

news
Basically, how does the combat go?


How many angels can dance on the head of a pin? Likely no
different than how the Japanese Zero's did against F-14's
in the 1980 movie, "The Final Countdown," starring Kirk Douglas,
Martin Sheen, Katharine Ross, and the nuclear aircraft carrier
USS Nimitz.


The F-4 never even sees the enemy? It should see the enemy from
30 miles away unless someone jams them, and most F-18s don't
have jamming ability (I think).


Are we talking E-model -18s when you mention "modern?" If so, the reduced
RCS alone may preclude the early F-4 and its rudimentary radar from even
seeing the -18s, let alone locking them...

JMHO,
Cory
"Happy to be here, proud to serve!"


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"W" is JFK's son and Bush revenge killed Kennedy in 1963 Ross C. Bubba Nicholson Instrument Flight Rules 2 August 28th 04 10:36 PM
"W" is JFK's son and Bush revenge killed Kennedy in 1963 Ross C. Bubba Nicholson Aviation Marketplace 0 August 28th 04 11:30 AM
"W" is JFK's son and Bush revenge killed Kennedy in 1963 Ross C. Bubba Nicholson Aerobatics 0 August 28th 04 11:28 AM
State Of Michigan Sales/Use Tax Rich S. Home Built 0 August 9th 04 04:41 PM
Homebuilts by State Ron Wanttaja Home Built 14 October 15th 03 08:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.