![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Youngquist" wrote in message I'm no expert on the matter, but it's my understanding that that sort of damage is done by methanol, as used in the early gasohol, but not by the ethanol that's used in more recent times. Is that incorrect? I don't know about that. I did think I understood that the problem with gasohol for airplanes was incompatibility with some rubber parts of the fuel system. -- Jim in NC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Morgans wrote:
I did think I understood that the problem with gasohol for airplanes was incompatibility with some rubber parts of the fuel system. That's what I've always heard too, but I've never been able to get anyone to back it up with info about SPECIFIC parts that are in danger. In particular, I'd really like to know what SPECIFIC parts I have to change in my IO-360-A1A's fuel system so I don't have to worry about alcohol. (It's in an experimental, so legality isn't an issue.) At the same time, I see all manner of decades-old cars & trucks running for many years on gas that's part alcohol, with all original fuel system parts, with no ill effects whatsoever. So I'm pretty close to writing off the whole ethanol fuel system damage thing as an old wives' tale, but not yet willing to bet the farm on it. -Dan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Youngquist" wrote That's what I've always heard too, but I've never been able to get anyone to back it up with info about SPECIFIC parts that are in danger. In particular, I'd really like to know what SPECIFIC parts I have to change in my IO-360-A1A's fuel system so I don't have to worry about alcohol. (It's in an experimental, so legality isn't an issue.) Well, let's think about it. I'm not an A&P, and have never torn an airplane carb or injector or fuel pump, or ..... apart. Nevertheless, we can take some very educated guess, and hopefully, some others with specific knowledge can jump in with some specifics of the systems. Let's look at the fuel system, from tank, all of the way until it goes "bang." (the gas in the fuel system, that is!) Fuel tank. Not a bladder, in an experimental, I would guess. Is it sloshed sealed? Some sloshes will definitely NOT hold up to alcohol. Some will. Is it sealed with other seam sealers? Again, some will hold up to alcohol, and some will not. What did you use, if you did use them? How about the seals or O-rings from the tank to fuel line fitting? What did you use there? My suggestion for this, and most all of the other replaceable parts, is to get an exact replacement and soak it in some E- 85. If that does not cause the part to do strange things, 10% gasohol should not cause a problem. Fuel line, and flexible transitions, if used? Again, test what you used, or find the manufacturer's recommendations, based on tests. Fuel Valve. Lots of O-rings, there. Will they test alright? Oh, back up. Fuel level indication sender, or sight glass and connections. Test them. Fuel pump, both electric auxiliary, and engine driven fuel pump. Use manufacturer's recommendations, as there are so many variables, possibly more in an electric. The engine driven pump recommendations will probably not allow gasohol, but you, or someone who knows how could tear one down, and soak test all of the non metal parts. Gasolater and other filters. Test, to verify they will hold up. Injector controls, spiders, and O-rings in all of these should be verified. All of the non metal parts if it is a carburetor, for some people. Then the injectors themselves will need a manufacturer's recommendation, or a test. Does that cover it all? What did I miss? How about everyone, and you, Dan? Do you think this kind of step by step investigation would uncover all of the weak parts, and prove them OK, or vulerenable? Is it all worth it? That would be a question you would have to answer. Perhaps another valid approach would be to contact groups that have flown gasohol, or pure ethanol airplanes. The EAA has done it; are there other groups that have? Would they be willing to share what they have learned? I await everyone's opinions. I agree with the premise that I think Dan has; that it should be possible, and practical to develop a gasohol safe airplane. "Some will no doubt shout, you will crash and burn!" This could be an interesting discussion. -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.owning Morgans wrote:
snip I await everyone's opinions. I agree with the premise that I think Dan has; that it should be possible, and practical to develop a gasohol safe airplane. "Some will no doubt shout, you will crash and burn!" This could be an interesting discussion. Since Embraer has an alcohol fueled aircraft in production, it is obviously possible. http://www.defesanet.com.br/embraer/ipanema1000th.htm The question then becomes what would it take to retrofit an existing aircraft? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 6, 9:05 pm, wrote:
In rec.aviation.owning Morgans wrote: snip I await everyone's opinions. I agree with the premise that I think Dan has; that it should be possible, and practical to develop a gasohol safe airplane. "Some will no doubt shout, you will crash and burn!" This could be an interesting discussion. Since Embraer has an alcohol fueled aircraft in production, it is obviously possible. http://www.defesanet.com.br/embraer/ipanema1000th.htm The question then becomes what would it take to retrofit an existing aircraft? My understanding is that multi-fuel engines were the norm in Brazil for a while. These could run on straight gasoline or high alcohol content fuel. The early ones had a manual switch, but later models used a fuel density detector which automatically adjusted on the fly. The last I read, Brazil was moving towards tighter standards for auto fuel, and the multifuel engines were being phased out. -- FF |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Youngquist" wrote in message hell.org... On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Morgans wrote: I did think I understood that the problem with gasohol for airplanes was incompatibility with some rubber parts of the fuel system. That's what I've always heard too, but I've never been able to get anyone to back it up with info about SPECIFIC parts that are in danger. In particular, I'd really like to know what SPECIFIC parts I have to change in my IO-360-A1A's fuel system so I don't have to worry about alcohol. (It's in an experimental, so legality isn't an issue.) At the same time, I see all manner of decades-old cars & trucks running for many years on gas that's part alcohol, with all original fuel system parts, with no ill effects whatsoever. So I'm pretty close to writing off the whole ethanol fuel system damage thing as an old wives' tale, but not yet willing to bet the farm on it. -Dan Fuel tank sealer (aka Proseal), fuel hoses, tank floats, carb floats, etc. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blueskies" Fuel tank sealer (aka Proseal), fuel hoses, tank floats, carb floats, etc. Miscellaneous gaskets Montblack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gasohol | Blueskies | Piloting | 240 | July 6th 07 12:42 AM |
How scary is gasohol? | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 27 | March 1st 04 11:39 AM |