![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Mxsmanic wrote: Marty Shapiro writes: Not only are you a moron, you're an asshole as well. How stupid does one have to be to think that just because a printed chart (updated every 6 months, and at least 1 month out of date when it appears) shows an airport that the airport is still really operational as an airport? It's just a strip of dirt. That's all it has ever been. You can still land on it and take off from it, so it's operational. It doesn't need a tower or terminal or first-class lounge to be a usable airport. There is a HUGE difference between a strip of dirt, and an open, Operational field. According to the owners of the field, The Arizona DOT, it is closed and not to be used for any operations. And you of all people should know that, seeing that you allegedly LIVED in Arizona. It is CLOSED, and therefore not a usable field for anything at all, expect a decent place to put down for an emergency landing. Expect this field to show up shortly at airfields-freeman.com for being Abandoned/Closed. I'm even willing to bet it won't even show up as abandoned on the next sectional. The VFR sectional charts are issued every 6 months. The Grand Canyon chart is on a "when issued" cycle. Only a stupid buttwipe like you would believe that just because it's on the unexpired chart its still there. It's on both charts. How about this. Pull up Skype and call the closest FSS to Tuweep (Prescott FSS). Ask them if Tuweep is an open field. Then report back to us what their answer was. Be sure to put your tail between your legs when you do. Did you try looking up Tuweep in the A/FD, which is also a federal government publication, but is updated on 56 day cycle? Yes, but it's not listed. Of course, many airports are not listed. So you refuse to believe the government, who controls the charts and listings for active fields? You are pathetic. The Arizona Department of Transportation used to maintain Tuweep. What maintenance did a dirt strip require? Lessee.. Active listing in A/FDs, for one, magnetic variation for the runway, appropriate calculable runway length/width, MVAs for that area.. Need I go on? Try filing a VFR flight plan to L50 with DUATS. Let us know if it is accepted. You can fly VFR without a flight plan. Well, no ****. Read what he said. File a flight plan, VFR, IFR or whatever, to L50 with DUATs. And while he may not say it, I will. I'll guaran-damn-tee it won't be accepted. Your statements are pure unadulterated bull ****. In other words, you disagree, which is your prerogative. I have to agree with him. Your statements are pure unsustantiated bull****. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGZmmwyBkZmuMZ8L8RAk/5AJ0dx8+uo0pbDehJjdBOo9caLT78WACgge17 bfXmlKGkzByAIpUqKjriMxE= =ci/d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Guy Called Tyketto writes:
There is a HUGE difference between a strip of dirt, and an open, Operational field. There are many strips of dirt that are open and operational fields. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Mxsmanic wrote: A Guy Called Tyketto writes: There is a HUGE difference between a strip of dirt, and an open, Operational field. There are many strips of dirt that are open and operational fields. Which those 'many strips of dirt' are irrelevant to the one in discussion: Tuweep. The airport is closed. It is no longer open and operational. There is documentation publically available to support this, yet you refuse to believe it. Like others, I hope to never fly with you or around you (which won't happen, since you said you won't/don't fly). BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGZzc2yBkZmuMZ8L8RAp3vAJ4mBqMLluHKYUpJYLEx3i WBkCBU0wCeM7il NunJpEq/y+uldIgBOb5B/Fg= =P5Z4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Guy Called Tyketto writes:
Like others, I hope to never fly with you or around you (which won't happen, since you said you won't/don't fly). Neither do you. Why is that significant for me, but not for you? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Mxsmanic wrote: A Guy Called Tyketto writes: Like others, I hope to never fly with you or around you (which won't happen, since you said you won't/don't fly). Neither do you. Why is that significant for me, but not for you? Don't know where you heard that; I just transferred my hours from my time at CCSN at VGT to the flight school at Rancho Murieta. You just proved my point; you mouth off before you have any facts to support your comment. That makes you, and everything you say, a crock. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGZ5YUyBkZmuMZ8L8RAtZiAKD3cHc7mrDcMT8bco6IQN xITPL8dQCgyqLc CN4zU5mmqFfHdBOzVC/Xq2o= =bUE4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Guy Called Tyketto writes:
Don't know where you heard that ... From the FAA. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 7, 8:00 am, Mxsmanic wrote:
A Guy Called Tyketto writes: Don't know where you heard that ... From the FAA. Do you expect us to believe you actually "heard" anything from the FAA? When you google up an FAA document, do you hear FAA worker voices in your head? F-- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: A Guy Called Tyketto writes: Don't know where you heard that ... From the FAA. The FAA are talking to you now, are they? Got a special chip installed, did you? Bertie |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: A Guy Called Tyketto writes: Like others, I hope to never fly with you or around you (which won't happen, since you said you won't/don't fly). Neither do you. Why is that significant for me, but not for you? I fly, therefore I can say you are nothing but a coprophilic insect.. Fjukktard Bertie |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: A Guy Called Tyketto writes: There is a HUGE difference between a strip of dirt, and an open, Operational field. There are many strips of dirt that are open and operational fields. How would you know wannabe boi? You don't fly and never will. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grand Canyon West Airport - 1G4 | Dan | Piloting | 6 | November 29th 06 01:11 AM |
Grand Canyon overflight proposal | john smith | Piloting | 71 | April 23rd 06 05:30 AM |
Four States and the Grand Canyon | Mary Daniel or David Grah | Soaring | 6 | December 6th 04 10:36 AM |
PIREP: Grand Canyon Caverns (L37) | Tony Cox | Piloting | 4 | November 2nd 03 12:54 PM |
Near Catasstrophy over Grand Canyon! | Boudewijn van Ingen | Simulators | 5 | August 6th 03 09:55 PM |