Bad pilots, bad maintenance ruining general aviation

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...

United 232 was faulty maintenance. There was a crack in the engine that
had
gone undetected, even though it had been inspected. If it had been
properly
maintained, there would have been no crash.

You really are clueless. How, specifically, did mantenance fail 232?

Maxwell writes:

You really are clueless. How, specifically, did mantenance fail 232?

They performed multiple FPIs on the failed fan disk (proved by the presence of
traces of the dye on the part that failed) without actually noticing that the
results indicated a problem.

See NTSB/AAR-90/06 for details.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Maxwell writes:

You really are clueless. How, specifically, did mantenance fail 232?

They performed multiple FPIs on the failed fan disk (proved by the
presence of
traces of the dye on the part that failed) without actually noticing that
the
results indicated a problem.

See NTSB/AAR-90/06 for details.

How do you know their results indicated a problem?

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Maxwell writes:

You really are clueless. How, specifically, did mantenance fail 232?

They performed multiple FPIs on the failed fan disk (proved by the
presence of traces of the dye on the part that failed) without
actually noticing that the results indicated a problem.

That's right fjukktard, but the conclusion you draw from it means you have
no more understanding of what the real problem was than you have of
anyhitng else.


Zippo, fjukkwit.


Bertie