ACLU sues Jeppesen for Flights

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...
Kloudy via AviationKB.com wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:


But those that support socialism and would like to see it in place
in this country are, unfortunately, not.

Nor are those intent on a christian theocracy.

I don't support them either. As a matter of fact I'd place them on pretty
equal levels of "not a good thingness."

"Goofy bastiges" in my book.

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...
Mxsmanic wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder writes:

My problem with the ACLU is they promote themselves as defenders of
the Bill of Rights. Yet they are very selective of what rights they
defend.

Actually, the ACLU has an extremely consistent record of
unconditionally defending civil liberties, without respect to race,
creed, color ... or popularity.

From the ACLU web site:

"Majority power is limited by the Constitution's Bill of Rights, which
consists of the original ten amendments ratified in 1791, plus the three
post-Civil War amendments (the 13th, 14th and 15th) and the 19th Amendment
(women's suffrage), adopted in 1920."


Yet never once have they defended the 2nd amendment.
Or the 9th, 10th...

Their take on the others is anything but consistent.

See how often they've intervened when a conservative or libertarian, such as
Walter Williams, Thomas Sowell, Ward Connerly, etc., have been shut down,
intimidated....

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...
Jim Logajan wrote:

http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html

"The ACLU Defends Gun Rights"

http://www.reason.com/blog/show/119544.html

If anyone ever forms a U.S. national organization that defends all our
civil rights then I would support it.


I especilly like this from the ACLU site

"IN BRIEF
The national ACLU is neutral on the issue of gun control. We believe that
the Constitution contains no barriers to reasonable regulations of gun
ownership. If we can license and register cars, we can license and
register guns. "

I wonder how they would react if there were a law that required you to be
registered to speak?

I liked this part:

"But it is notable that the gun angle did not prevent the Texas chapter from
getting involved, despite the national organization's position that the
Second Amendment does not protect an individual right to keep and bear
arms."

Something stinks to high hell....kinda like the Vatican holding $$TRILLIONS
in art treasures and real estate and telling the rest of the world to "feed
the poor".

"Ash Wyllie" wrote in message
...
Jim Maher opined

Why not sue the company that made the diodes in the VOR beacons that the
flights may have used, or the headset manufacturer too? What a pity
that valuable court resources are consumed by the ACLU's bilge.

Don't give them any ideas.

They're already working overtime to come up with such daffyness.

"Kloudy via AviationKB.com" u33403@uwe wrote in message
news:7342b4da783d0@uwe...
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:


Nor are those intent on a christian theocracy.

I don't support them either. As a matter of fact I'd place them on pretty
equal levels of "not a good thingness."

Sorry. I didn't really mean to imply that you did. I was trying to create
that sense of often parallel, extreme ideologies that are, as you say,
"not a
good thingness"


Extreme ideologies...like liberty?

I mean the real thing, not the current Republicrat collectivism/statism
thing.

"Kloudy via AviationKB.com" u33403@uwe wrote in message
news:734108f5ed1b1@uwe...
Robert Barker wrote:
hold Jeppesen responsible for running a torture chamber too.

[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]

Perhaps they're using this suit to get information under "discovery" to
find
out what the CIA is really up to. Then when they get the info, they'll
drop
the suit and go after the real perps...

This current administration has been consistently expanding the power of
the
executive thru a bizarre flurry of signing statements and other policy
decisions that severely threaten our rights under the constitution.

As compared with his predecessor, the top "Executive Orders" issuer, who
didn't have even a single minor crisis during his regime?

Matt Barrow wrote:
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...
Jim Logajan wrote:

http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html

"The ACLU Defends Gun Rights"

http://www.reason.com/blog/show/119544.html

If anyone ever forms a U.S. national organization that defends all
our civil rights then I would support it.


I especilly like this from the ACLU site

"IN BRIEF
The national ACLU is neutral on the issue of gun control. We believe
that the Constitution contains no barriers to reasonable regulations
of gun ownership. If we can license and register cars, we can
license and register guns. "

I wonder how they would react if there were a law that required you
to be registered to speak?

I liked this part:

"But it is notable that the gun angle did not prevent the Texas
chapter from getting involved, despite the national organization's
position that the Second Amendment does not protect an individual
right to keep and bear arms."

Something stinks to high hell....kinda like the Vatican holding
$$TRILLIONS in art treasures and real estate and telling the rest of
the world to "feed the poor".


Texas & ACLU. That's two you don't put together often unless there is a "v."
in between them.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Gig 601XL Builder writes:

Yet never once have they defended the 2nd amendment.

Against what?



Fjukkwit

Bertie

Matt Barrow wrote:
But those that support socialism and would like to see it in place in this
country are, unfortunately, not.

Nor are those intent on a christian theocracy.

Before you shove your poop encrusted foot into your mouth, you might find
out the beliefs of the person you are refering to.

Doesn't matter.
I'm willing to discuss things with most rational people of any belief.
Unless he/she believes a christian theocracy is preferable....then it still
doesn't matter.

--
Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com

Matt Barrow wrote:
Nor are those intent on a christian theocracy.

[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
"not a
good thingness"

Extreme ideologies...like liberty?

I mean the real thing, not the current Republicrat collectivism/statism
thing.

I don't think I suggested liberty was an extreme ideology.

Erosion of our liberties is to what I refer and republicrat, fascism, statism
are not preferable either.

--
Message posted via AviationKB.com
http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200706/1