Myth: 1 G barrel rolls are impossible.

Viperdoc writes:

That's the point you idiot- there is no change in direction during a
vertical roll.

You cannot change the attitude, direction, altitude, etc., of the aircraft
without changing its direction in some plane, and that requires acceleration.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Viperdoc writes:

That's the point you idiot- there is no change in direction during a
vertical roll.

You cannot change the attitude, direction, altitude, etc., of the
aircraft without changing its direction in some plane, and that
requires acceleration.


Nope, yer, wrong, fjukktard. Again


Bertei

What you said about acceleration is true enough, but if you were on
speaking terms with Newton or vector analysis of some other analytical
tools you might understand some of what's been said here.


not continue to offer

On Jun 13, 2:32 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Viperdoc writes:
That's the point you idiot- there is no change in direction during a
vertical roll.

You cannot change the attitude, direction, altitude, etc., of the aircraft
without changing its direction in some plane, and that requires acceleration.

writes:

What you said about acceleration is true enough, but if you were on
speaking terms with Newton or vector analysis of some other analytical
tools you might understand some of what's been said here.

Most of what has been said here has been said by people who manifestly lack
even the most basic notions of physics. I don't understand how people can
believe that changes in direction are possible without accelerations.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...

Most of what has been said here has been said by people who manifestly
lack
even the most basic notions of physics.

Most of what has been said here has been said by YOU, so this statement is
probably true.

I don't understand how people can believe that changes in direction are
possible without accelerations.

There are lots of things you don't understand. Unfortunately, you won't
accept it.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

writes:

What you said about acceleration is true enough, but if you were on
speaking terms with Newton or vector analysis of some other
analytical tools you might understand some of what's been said here.

Most of what has been said here has been said by people who manifestly
lack even the most basic notions of physics.

Like you, for instance.

I don't understand

I know.


Bertie