![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... tjd wrote: On Jun 14, 4:01 pm, Jim Stewart wrote: Without casting doubts on your accuracy, I'd have to say that the story just doesn't ring right. It sounds silly, but nevertheless is apparently true: http://www.kansascity.com/115/story/148115.html OK, Now I understand what happened. ATC didn't understand what was said and couldn't contact the pilot to clear it up. "The air traffic controller frantically tried to verify what he had heard, but the pilot had turned off his radio, Yates said." He's flying over an AF base and turns off his radio? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Matt Barrow" wrote: "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... tjd wrote: On Jun 14, 4:01 pm, Jim Stewart wrote: Without casting doubts on your accuracy, I'd have to say that the story just doesn't ring right. It sounds silly, but nevertheless is apparently true: http://www.kansascity.com/115/story/148115.html OK, Now I understand what happened. ATC didn't understand what was said and couldn't contact the pilot to clear it up. "The air traffic controller frantically tried to verify what he had heard, but the pilot had turned off his radio, Yates said." He's flying over an AF base and turns off his radio? I like the bit about, "As a courtesy, the pilot informed the air traffic tower at the base that he was entering the basešs airspace." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... In article , "Matt Barrow" wrote: "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... "The air traffic controller frantically tried to verify what he had heard, but the pilot had turned off his radio, Yates said." He's flying over an AF base and turns off his radio? I like the bit about, "As a courtesy, the pilot informed the air traffic tower at the base that he was entering the basešs airspace." Good manners are SOOO important. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Matt Barrow" wrote: "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... tjd wrote: On Jun 14, 4:01 pm, Jim Stewart wrote: Without casting doubts on your accuracy, I'd have to say that the story just doesn't ring right. It sounds silly, but nevertheless is apparently true: http://www.kansascity.com/115/story/148115.html OK, Now I understand what happened. ATC didn't understand what was said and couldn't contact the pilot to clear it up. "The air traffic controller frantically tried to verify what he had heard, but the pilot had turned off his radio, Yates said." He's flying over an AF base and turns off his radio? Once one reports clear of the CDAS there is not longer any requirement to remain on frequency. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
john smith wrote:
In article , "Matt Barrow" wrote: "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... tjd wrote: On Jun 14, 4:01 pm, Jim Stewart wrote: Without casting doubts on your accuracy, I'd have to say that the story just doesn't ring right. It sounds silly, but nevertheless is apparently true: http://www.kansascity.com/115/story/148115.html OK, Now I understand what happened. ATC didn't understand what was said and couldn't contact the pilot to clear it up. "The air traffic controller frantically tried to verify what he had heard, but the pilot had turned off his radio, Yates said." He's flying over an AF base and turns off his radio? Once one reports clear of the CDAS there is not longer any requirement to remain on frequency. I didn't say there was. The point is that the controller heard him say something that made him think there was a problem. To confirm he tried to contact him and he didn't answer. This would have magnified the concern he already had. What do you think would have happened to the controller if he had just blown off his concern and the aircraft had been hijacked? Keep in mind that about 90% of the post 9/11 changes have been nothing more than CYA procedures. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote: What do you think would have happened to the controller if he had just blown off his concern and the aircraft had been hijacked? Keep in mind that about 90% of the post 9/11 changes have been nothing more than CYA procedures. All they had to do was listen to the tapes. They have them right there in the facility with them. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASW 15 and concerns | [email protected] | Soaring | 5 | April 14th 07 03:11 AM |
Any concerns using SuperFlite System I? | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 1 | November 6th 06 04:50 PM |
F-35's Costs Climb Along With Concerns | Seawolf | Naval Aviation | 87 | May 9th 06 09:30 PM |
Fund Raising | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | July 5th 05 06:04 PM |
Reprise - Oxygen concerns | Neptune | Soaring | 20 | May 27th 04 03:27 PM |