![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Gideon wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:07:22 -0700, Jay Honeck wrote: concluded that General Aviation is no longer worth pursuing This may not have been decided quite as simplistically as you seem to feel. Perhaps the conclusion was that Piper could not afford to catch up with the likes of Cessna, Cirrus, whatever the company name is that builds the Columbia 350/400, etc. I was at a certain very large company a number of years ago that (1) spent a lot of money on getting certain compilers developed and certified but (2) chose to keep them out of the market because they couldn't compete with the more lithe firms delivering equivalent products. If it makes you feel better, the markets for those compilers still exist (though there is plenty of linguistic competition {8^) and the company that made that choice no longer exists (though the name lives on in a rather ghoulish way {8^). Digital? CDC? Univac? Honeywell? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Blanche wrote: Andrew Gideon wrote: On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:07:22 -0700, Jay Honeck wrote: concluded that General Aviation is no longer worth pursuing This may not have been decided quite as simplistically as you seem to feel. Perhaps the conclusion was that Piper could not afford to catch up with the likes of Cessna, Cirrus, whatever the company name is that builds the Columbia 350/400, etc. I was at a certain very large company a number of years ago that (1) spent a lot of money on getting certain compilers developed and certified but (2) chose to keep them out of the market because they couldn't compete with the more lithe firms delivering equivalent products. If it makes you feel better, the markets for those compilers still exist (though there is plenty of linguistic competition {8^) and the company that made that choice no longer exists (though the name lives on in a rather ghoulish way {8^). Digital? CDC? Univac? Honeywell? Data General? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
john smith wrote:
Digital? CDC? Univac? Honeywell? Data General? It sounds like a trip through Massachusetts... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:11:37 +0000, B A R R Y wrote:
john smith wrote: Digital? CDC? Univac? Honeywell? Data General? It sounds like a trip through Massachusetts... Swell. You guys have found a new layer of gloom with which to depress me. - Andrew |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Andrew Gideon wrote: It sounds like a trip through Massachusetts... Swell. You guys have found a new layer of gloom with which to depress me. - Andrew lotsa of stuff in taxachusetts to be gloomy about. More taxes, Ma$$port, even more taxes. -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
B A R R Y writes:
It sounds like a trip through Massachusetts... Or Stepford. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: B A R R Y writes: It sounds like a trip through Massachusetts... Or Stepford. But fortunatle not through that convulted mess you cal a mind Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|