![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
oups.com... Two more ideas for the "no F/A-18s supporting Marine riflemen on the beach" discussion: First: In Stephen Coonts book "The Intruders" the fictional Marine A-6E/KA-6D squadron embarked on a carrier was described almost as "a bunch of clowns incapable to safely fly and fight from the Boat, if no experienced Navy officers were assigned". I think that is a Blue Ops days view, very harmful and unjust for the Marine Corps aviation! Second: No massive assault on the beach was seen recently (there is no beach in Afghanistan at all;-))), but I cannot resist the impression that new gizmos like ROVER, low-collateral-damage and small-diameter bombs, land-based detachments of carrier-based units (so-called "Cactus Air Force", once involving VFA-15 and VFA-87's F/A-18s) are just for improving CAS capablities... No matter if that were carrier-based F-14 and F/A-18s flying over Iraq, or Navy's VFA-94 and VFA-97 rotating at Iwakuni, now CAS looks to be too important to be forgotten. Through the definition now switched from "assault on the beach CAS" to "urban CAS". Just some of my observations, no first-hand experience with CAS, or no- CAS... Best regards, Jacek The Navy has noticed - so has the Marine Corps - that if you want very short response times for CAS, going into places like Iraq and Afghanistan, you aren't going to ship-base anyway. When we handled AV-8's in Camp Lejeune, they routinely touched down on a main road aboard base, after they got there from Cherry Point...little bit of training doing that, then back up in the air to attack G-10 impact. During GW1 Harriers and Cobras did most of the CAS and CIFS for Marines. Close to 70 Harriers actually operated from airbases on land, and they were closer to Iraq than any carrier air. Only 20 Harriers were at sea. The average turnaround for the land-based planes was about 25 minutes. Considering that I was in one of the first planned assault waves for more than one Kuwait landing, I got a warm fuzzy from seeing a mean AH-1 perched on the deck. We usually had a few on USS RALEIGH. The problem with an area like the Gulf and the North Arabian Sea is shallow water and Iran. You just are not going to want to get that close. As fast as planes fly, CAS is no good if it takes an hour to get there. You need it in 10 minutes. AHS |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If so, I would not be much astonished to see the Corps saying goodbye
to their F/A-18s earlier than doing the same with Harriers they're in a better control of... Sad to hear that... Now planes from the carrier flying five-plus-hours XCAS missions, with not fewer than three refuelings and some (I believe not much) loiter time "in the box", and it is all for nothing?... On the other hand, an aircraft carrier is a nice tool to deliver some Marine TACAIR to a base ashore (if available) when something happens in the region given, especially when Marine units are better suited/ trained to fulfill the task. I have heard such a practice (of having several birds rotating at not-fully-equipped land airfield and fully maintained on the Boat) was positively tested recent years. Best regards, Jacek On 23 Cze, 17:08, "Arved Sandstrom" wrote: The Navy has noticed - so has the Marine Corps - that if you want very short response times for CAS, going into places like Iraq and Afghanistan, you aren't going to ship-base anyway. When we handled AV-8's in Camp Lejeune, they routinely touched down on a main road aboard base, after they got there from Cherry Point...little bit of training doing that, then back up in the air to attack G-10 impact. During GW1 Harriers and Cobras did most of the CAS and CIFS for Marines. Close to 70 Harriers actually operated from airbases on land, and they were closer to Iraq than any carrier air. Only 20 Harriers were at sea. The average turnaround for the land-based planes was about 25 minutes. Considering that I was in one of the first planned assault waves for more than one Kuwait landing, I got a warm fuzzy from seeing a mean AH-1 perched on the deck. We usually had a few on USS RALEIGH. The problem with an area like the Gulf and the North Arabian Sea is shallow water and Iran. You just are not going to want to get that close. As fast as planes fly, CAS is no good if it takes an hour to get there. You need it in 10 minutes. AHS |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USMC F/A-18F Super Hornet (not 'E') | P50[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 2 | May 21st 07 02:58 AM |
Two more Super Hornet squadrons | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 1 | May 20th 05 03:53 PM |
Why doesn't the Super Hornet have canards? | Henry J Cobb | Naval Aviation | 5 | June 30th 04 09:01 AM |
ID question: hornet or super-hornet? | Jim Battista | Military Aviation | 12 | April 20th 04 10:33 PM |