![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I rather suspect that once CO2 emission are "cured", such as a fuel cell
vehicle, there'll be something else for the hystericals to fall back on. Do you think the CO2 emissions would have been cured had there been no hystericals? Jose -- You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jose wrote: I rather suspect that once CO2 emission are "cured", such as a fuel cell vehicle, there'll be something else for the hystericals to fall back on. Do you think the CO2 emissions would have been cured had there been no hystericals? The hystericals were not necessary and could have been a detriment. -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you think the CO2 emissions would have been cured had there been no
hystericals? The hystericals were not necessary and could have been a detriment. Then why were the CO2 emissions cured? It certainly costs money, and companies don't spend money for nothing. Jose -- You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jose wrote: Do you think the CO2 emissions would have been cured had there been no hystericals? The hystericals were not necessary and could have been a detriment. Then why were the CO2 emissions cured? It certainly costs money, and companies don't spend money for nothing. I think you missed my point. I hope you missed my point. I hope you don't think hysterical arguement actually help convince people and are the PROPER way to have discussions on issues. -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think you missed my point. I hope you missed my point. I hope
you don't think hysterical arguement actually help convince people and are the PROPER way to have discussions on issues. Alas, I was misread. Hysterical arguments don't convince anybody, but rational arguments are derided as "hysterical" by those who oppose them. I should have quoted the word. Jose -- You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... In article , Jose wrote: Do you think the CO2 emissions would have been cured had there been no hystericals? The hystericals were not necessary and could have been a detriment. Then why were the CO2 emissions cured? It certainly costs money, and companies don't spend money for nothing. I think you missed my point. I hope you missed my point. I hope you don't think hysterical arguement actually help convince people and are the PROPER way to have discussions on issues. Bob! He's a teacher, not a scholar. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... In article , Jose wrote: I rather suspect that once CO2 emission are "cured", such as a fuel cell vehicle, there'll be something else for the hystericals to fall back on. Do you think the CO2 emissions would have been cured had there been no hystericals? The hystericals were not necessary and could have been a detriment. Is it even something that NEEDS TO BE CURED? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jose wrote: I rather suspect that once CO2 emission are "cured", such as a fuel cell vehicle, there'll be something else for the hystericals to fall back on. Do you think the CO2 emissions would have been cured had there been no hystericals? Jose The case against CO2 has not been proven -- nor has the case for manmade global warming. The hystericals have latched onto it to further their own political ends -- namely control of others' lives and lifestyles. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
I rather suspect that once CO2 emission are "cured", such as a fuel cell vehicle, there'll be something else for the hystericals to fall back on. Do you think the CO2 emissions would have been cured had there been no hystericals? What has panic and mindless blather ever solved? Tell me one thing that hysterics have ever cured? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you think the CO2 emissions would have been cured had there been no
hystericals? What has panic and mindless blather ever solved? Tell me one thing that hysterics have ever cured? I was not referring to hysterics, but rather, to "hysterics", and should have quoted the word originally. People opposed to environmental safeguards call them hysterics in the same way that people opposed to airport closures refer to "noise nazis". In that sense, "hysterics" (legitimage drawing of attention to the damage we are causing to our and our neighbor's environment) have cured many things. I am most grateful to the "hysterics" of the 1960s for the relatively clean air we breathe today. One only has to go to parts of Europe to breathe the difference (at least when I was last there). As for whether CO2 needed to be "cured", that's not my point. The statement was made that it =was= cured (along with other things including doubling the gas milage), proving that the "hysterics" were unnecessary. I do not see any such proof demonstrated by the facts presented (which I will stipulate), especially as the "cure" was likely to be costly, and business doesn't like costly things. Jose -- You can choose whom to befriend, but you cannot choose whom to love. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gasohol | Blueskies | Piloting | 240 | July 6th 07 12:42 AM |
How scary is gasohol? | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 27 | March 1st 04 11:39 AM |