![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anthony W wrote:
What, no link??? Tony There's only 1 172G listed right now. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie wrote:
What, no link??? There's only 1 172G listed right now. I found it but for some reason searching on 172 didn't find it. It's not in my budget but it looks like a pretty good deal. Tony |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anthony W wrote:
Ron Natalie wrote: What, no link??? There's only 1 172G listed right now. I found it but for some reason searching on 172 didn't find it. It's not in my budget but it looks like a pretty good deal. Tony Since when are 172s homebuilts? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 1, 5:45 pm, Matt Whiting wrote:
Anthony W wrote: Since when are 172s homebuilts? Since airplane buyers are often looking for an airplane but are flexible in terms of exactly what they are going to buy. Someone looking for a Christavia Mk. 4 homebuilt , an O'Neill Magnum homebuilt, a 4 seat Comp Monster homebuilt, or perhaps someone who WAS willing to settle for a Kitfox... may find that they can get a 172 for the same price, regardless of whether it is certified. In other words, a seller of a Turbine Legend, or a 2/3 scale P-51, or a brand new Yak-18 / CJ-6 would ROUTINELY put their ad in a Warbirds newsgroup even though a Legend and a Chinese trainer are definitely not warbirds, but because those airplanes have the same kind of performance as many warbirds... it's fair game. And a guy who wants a P-51 but is thinking twice about the price tag might be interested to know of an airplane of similar performance for less money. BTW, the reserve price of $24,000 HAS been met on this auction, so at this stage high bid flies away with a good solid airplane. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Victor Bravo" wrote in message
oups.com... On Jul 1, 5:45 pm, Matt Whiting wrote: Anthony W wrote: Since when are 172s homebuilts? Since airplane buyers are often looking for an airplane but are flexible in terms of exactly what they are going to buy. Ya think maybe of someone's looking to BUY a plane they might check RAM ? Posting this on RAH is spam. I'll give ya $10 for it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 2, 4:12 pm, "El Maximo" wrote:
Ya think maybe of someone's looking to BUY a plane they might check RAM ? Posting this on RAH is spam. I'll give ya $10 for it. But Your Honor, does that mean that all the hundreds of 'experimental for sale' notices I saw on RAH for YEARS were also spam... but you and the Content Police DIDN'T bitch them out? That would constitute a "prescriptive easement", to use a common real estate term, meaning that if similar postings not 100% on-topic were tolerated on RAH in the past then at a certain point the Content Police lose their right to arbitrarily yip-yap about it at a later date. Postings not 100% on-topic in RAH... Perish the thought! Send me the ten dollars, I'll see whether the owner will take it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Victor Bravo" wrote in message
oups.com... On Jul 2, 4:12 pm, "El Maximo" wrote: Ya think maybe of someone's looking to BUY a plane they might check RAM ? Posting this on RAH is spam. I'll give ya $10 for it. But Your Honor, does that mean that all the hundreds of 'experimental for sale' notices I saw on RAH for YEARS were also spam... Yes. but you and the Content Police DIDN'T bitch them out? Nope. That would constitute a "prescriptive easement", to use a common real estate term, meaning that if similar postings not 100% on-topic were tolerated on RAH in the past then at a certain point the Content Police lose their right to arbitrarily yip-yap about it at a later date. It's still spam Postings not 100% on-topic in RAH... Perish the thought! Send me the ten dollars, I'll see whether the owner will take it. Never mind. I won't buy from spammers. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:02:11 -0700, Victor Bravo
wrote: On Jul 1, 5:45 pm, Matt Whiting wrote: Anthony W wrote: Since when are 172s homebuilts? Since airplane buyers are often looking for an airplane but are flexible in terms of exactly what they are going to buy. Someone looking for a Christavia Mk. 4 homebuilt , an O'Neill Magnum homebuilt, a 4 seat Comp Monster homebuilt, or perhaps someone who WAS willing to settle for a Kitfox... may find that they can get a 172 for the same price, regardless of whether it is certified. In other words, a seller of a Turbine Legend, or a 2/3 scale P-51, or a brand new Yak-18 / CJ-6 would ROUTINELY put their ad in a Warbirds newsgroup even though a Legend and a Chinese trainer are definitely not warbirds, but because those airplanes have the same kind of performance as many warbirds... it's fair game. And a guy who wants a P-51 but is thinking twice about the price tag might be interested to know of an airplane of similar performance for less money. BTW, the reserve price of $24,000 HAS been met on this auction, so at this stage high bid flies away with a good solid airplane. Geez, Marketing 101. Whodathunkit? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 C-172 For Auction | Victor Bravo | Home Built | 32 | July 13th 07 02:19 AM |
The Auction Hangar - Completely free aviation auction site. | The Auction Hangar | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | April 19th 04 12:37 AM |
The Auction Hangar - Completely free aviation auction site. | The Auction Hangar | Military Aviation | 0 | April 6th 04 12:58 AM |
The Auction Hangar - Completely free aviation auction site. | The Auction Hangar | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | April 6th 04 12:57 AM |
The Auction Hangar - Completely free aviation auction site. | The Auction Hangar | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | April 6th 04 12:57 AM |