A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Standards for H.P. corr. factors ??



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 7th 07, 11:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Standards for H.P. corr. factors ??


wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jul 7, 1:39 pm, "Peter Dohm" wrote:

I am much more of a theoretical engine guy than a real engine guy, and

IIRC
it took a little effort on your part to set me straight on the thermal
limits of the VW heads; so I have faith that you will help to clear up
whatever misconceptions I may have on this as well.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------

Dear Peter,

The magnesium crankcase is referred to as aluminum, old, used parts
are referred to as 'factory new,' bearing shells are installed atop a
splatter of spray-paint... But the humor has more to do with the
overall incompetence of the video rather than the fallacious
statements. The video is larded with hilarious Mechanical Sight-Gags
that can't be described without losing the essence of the humor; you
NEED to see it for yourself.

The Beer Fountain erupted when, upon completing some mundane task, the
assembler puts thumb to forefinger and gives the camera a close-up
'okay' for all the deaf-mutes in the audience. Doing it once was
funny but the second time even Old Stoneface cracked up: 'This guy
makes Dubya look like a Whiz Kid.'

Giiven the nature of the medium -- the ability to re-shoot a take
until they got it right -- it's hard to understand why they would
leave in so many scenes showing them doing things wrong. That caused
a bit of discussion, some arguing that it had to be a put-on... until
someone pointed out that they probably HAD re-shot and edited TO THE
BEST OF THEIR ABILITY. Which makes the video a ****-up of truly
monumental proportions.

Like I said, you've GOT to see it. This thing is a collector's item.

-R.S.Hoover

The search for a copy is now under way!

Thanks,
Peter


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Human factors RECKLESSNESS private Aerobatics 60 May 10th 05 05:52 AM
Human factors RECKLESSNESS private Piloting 68 May 10th 05 05:52 AM
Human factors RECKLESSNESS private Soaring 72 May 10th 05 05:52 AM
Strike Fighter Squadron OPTEMPO factors [email protected] Naval Aviation 4 March 3rd 05 12:14 PM
JAR 22 STANDARDS Gordon Schubert Soaring 2 April 7th 04 05:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.