![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 10, 6:51 am, Roy Smith wrote:
Then you should have gone around. Plan every approach to be a go-around, and only make the decision to land when you get to the threshold and everything is good. Exactly. Most landing accidents happen when things aren't coming together properly and the pilot insists on landing anyway. If this runway had been icy he'd likely have written the airplane off. Piper and Cessna took interesting divergent paths when they designed their airplanes. Piper decided they were going to use electric trim and manual flaps. Cessna decided on electric flaps and manual trim. In both cases, each manufacturer added one totally unnecessary electric system and thus saddled their owners with forever pouring money into fixing them. Maybe the high-wing design made it difficult to engineer a manual flap control linkage? Cessna originally built their singles with manual flaps. The 172 didn't get electric flaps until around 1967. The 180/185 never had them. Those airplanes could be landed really short, because the pilot could approach at minimum airspeed and dump the flaps instantly on touchdown and get lots of weight on the mains for braking. Electric flaps are too slow to retract. In any case, if it's not the breaker, if could be the actuator switch, the motor, one of the micro-switches that limit movement, or any of the wiring in between. Just bring it to your mechanic with your checkbook and let him put another kid through college :-) If It's what I think and the airplane has the preselector-type flap control, one of the microswitches on the lever follower is dead or disconnected. They do that. Dan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 07:06:54 -0700, Dan_Thomas_nospam wrote:
Exactly. Most landing accidents happen when things aren't coming together properly and the pilot insists on landing anyway. If this runway had been icy he'd likely have written the airplane off. I landed last week at CQX, a runway that (I've learned {8^) has a hump in the middle. As I was coming down, I suddenly realized that I'd far less runway than I thought I should have had. I probably could have put it down in the remaining distance, but around I went. As soon as I started climbing, the rest of the runway - hiding behind the hump - came into view. I did feel a little silly, but I also welcomed the practice. - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cowl Flaps | N114RW | Home Built | 0 | June 27th 07 09:25 PM |
What are cowl flaps? | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 31 | October 27th 06 04:28 PM |
Fowler flaps? | TJ400 | Home Built | 20 | May 19th 06 02:15 AM |
FLAPS | skysailor | Soaring | 36 | September 7th 05 05:28 AM |
FLAPS-Caution | Steve Leonard | Soaring | 0 | August 27th 05 04:10 AM |