![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Smith" wrote in message order. There is some logic in this. All the Cessna AFMs I've seen (i.e. for various flavors of their piston singles) have nice detailed performance charts showing how much runway you need to land with various combinations of weight, temperature, elevation, wind, and phase of moon, but the numbers always are for full flaps. There is NO data on how much runway you need without flaps, therefor there is no way you can comply with 91.103 which requires that you familiarize yourself with the takeoff and landing distances. Well, you certainly haven't seen all the Cessnas POHs. Mine has performance numbers for "SHORT FIELD" only. Normal landings can be conducted with ANY amount of flaps, per the FLAP LIMITATIONS section. Karl |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cowl Flaps | N114RW | Home Built | 0 | June 27th 07 09:25 PM |
What are cowl flaps? | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 31 | October 27th 06 04:28 PM |
Fowler flaps? | TJ400 | Home Built | 20 | May 19th 06 02:15 AM |
FLAPS | skysailor | Soaring | 36 | September 7th 05 05:28 AM |
FLAPS-Caution | Steve Leonard | Soaring | 0 | August 27th 05 04:10 AM |