![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Luke wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote: The Arrow I now fly which has a 3-blade prop is much worse than my 182 in the glide ratio department. I can barely make a 180 power-off landing with it. You have to turn base as soon as you cut power abeam the landing spot or you'll never make it! As a CFI giving me a checkout in an Arrow put it: "You can cut the power and glide a Cessna in, but a Piper comes down like dropped car keys." The Arrow wasn't all that bad with the original two-blade prop. But when the hub failed inspection requiring prop replacement, a decision was made to go with the 3-blade as it was cheaper (go figure). What a mistake. The 3-blade vibrates much more, doesn't perform any better on takeoff, climb or cruise, and performs MUCH worse during glide. Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting wrote:
The Arrow wasn't all that bad with the original two-blade prop. But when the hub failed inspection requiring prop replacement, a decision was made to go with the 3-blade as it was cheaper (go figure). What a mistake. The 3-blade vibrates much more, doesn't perform any better on takeoff, climb or cruise, and performs MUCH worse during glide. I'd look into having the prop indexed (ie. moved one blade on the hub) to fix the vibration issue... With the 3 blade, climb should be better, cruise will suffer, takeoff noise should be reduced too... My neighbors Baron lost nearly 8 knots on cruise, he's alot quieter when taking off over the house, and climbs very well out of short strips though... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 04:17:41 GMT, Darrel Toepfer
wrote: Matt Whiting wrote: The Arrow wasn't all that bad with the original two-blade prop. But when the hub failed inspection requiring prop replacement, a decision was made to go with the 3-blade as it was cheaper (go figure). What a mistake. The 3-blade vibrates much more, doesn't perform any better on takeoff, climb or cruise, and performs MUCH worse during glide. I'd look into having the prop indexed (ie. moved one blade on the hub) to fix the vibration issue... With the 3 blade, climb should be better, cruise will suffer, takeoff noise should be reduced too... My neighbors Baron lost nearly 8 knots on cruise, he's alot quieter when taking off over the house, and climbs very well out of short strips though... On the Deb I lost about 4 MPH on cruise and gained over 250 fpm on climb. It also made energy management and landings much easier. Now when ATC says "keep the speed up as long as praticable" it'll raise some eyebrows. :-)) Love it! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cowl Flaps | N114RW | Home Built | 0 | June 27th 07 09:25 PM |
What are cowl flaps? | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 31 | October 27th 06 04:28 PM |
Fowler flaps? | TJ400 | Home Built | 20 | May 19th 06 02:15 AM |
FLAPS | skysailor | Soaring | 36 | September 7th 05 05:28 AM |
FLAPS-Caution | Steve Leonard | Soaring | 0 | August 27th 05 04:10 AM |