Unusual Distractions

Why is it hyperbole or over the top? By your own admission you have never
flown and are afraid to fly.

You simply have no basis of comparison between playing a computer game and
the actual act of flying. Until you have done both, any pronouncements on
your part are based upon conjecture and supposition only.

This is why you have absolutely no credibility, and your statements lack
credence.

Viperdoc writes:

Why is it hyperbole or over the top?

Because it is such a severe exaggeration of reality. In trying to make your
point, you exaggerate your argument until it loses all credibility.

It's rather like counselors who warn teenagers that the first time they try a
drug they'll turn into addicts and end up in the gutter. Teenagers know that
this is a ridiculous exaggeration, and they tend not to take anything they
hear seriously once they realize that the counselor has chosen exaggeration
over truth.

By your own admission you have never flown and are afraid to fly.

I have flown many times, as a passenger. I'm not afraid to fly; I rather like
flying. I don't know how you reached these conclusions.

You simply have no basis of comparison between playing a computer game and
the actual act of flying. Until you have done both ...

I have done both.

This is why you have absolutely no credibility, and your statements lack
credence.

You're entitled to your opinion; I disagree with it. Others may form their
own opinions.

Just another bunch of your lies again, like saying you didn't have a blog.
Flying as a pax in the back of a heavy you might as well be in a FedEx box-
it is not the same as piloting an airplane, just like playing on your
computer is similar to piloting a real plane, like a Baron. If you claim
your experience as a passenger is the same as piloting, you truly are
delusional.

You have also stated in this NG that you are afraid of stalls and other
maneuvers including acro, yet these are all part of flying (steep turns and
stalls).

Playing a computer game will never be the same as actually flying,
particularly one as limited as MSFS. As has been written many times here, go
get a lesson or even a few hours of flying time in a trainer, and then come
back and share the experience.

Otherwise, you will never have any credibility and will remain a whining
wannabe.

"Viperdoc" wrote in message
...


Playing a computer game will never be the same as actually flying,

As intelligent as he thinks he is, he'll never figure that one out.

Viperdoc writes:

Just another bunch of your lies again, like saying you didn't have a blog.

You see, you're exaggerating again. I'm not a liar, so calling me one is
quite an exaggeration. And I've never had a blog.

You have also stated in this NG that you are afraid of stalls and other
maneuvers including acro, yet these are all part of flying (steep turns and
stalls).

Steep turns and stalls are not aerobatics, and I'm not afraid of them per se.
I just don't like extreme maneuvers; they increase risk.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Viperdoc writes:

Just another bunch of your lies again, like saying you didn't have a
blog.

You see, you're exaggerating again. I'm not a liar, so calling me one
is quite an exaggeration. And I've never had a blog.

You have also stated in this NG that you are afraid of stalls and
other maneuvers including acro, yet these are all part of flying
(steep turns and stalls).

Steep turns and stalls are not aerobatics, and I'm not afraid of them
per se. I just don't like extreme maneuvers; they increase risk.


Bwaahwhahwhahhwhahwhahhw!

What a fjukkwit you are.



Bertie

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Bwaahwhahwhahhwhahwhahhw!

I just wanted to point out to you that by responding to MX with content-free
posts, you do nothing but lower the signal/noise ratio even further.

In other words, plonk.

Adhominem wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

Bwaahwhahwhahhwhahwhahhw!

I just wanted to point out to you that by responding to MX with
content-free posts, you do nothing but lower the signal/noise ratio
even further.


Uh yes, I know.

R
This is news to you?


In other words, plonk.

And thus the signal/noise ratio is lowered even further by letting everyone
know.


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote:
Viperdoc writes:

Why is it hyperbole or over the top?

Because it is such a severe exaggeration of reality. In trying to make your
point, you exaggerate your argument until it loses all credibility.

It's rather like counselors who warn teenagers that the first time they try a
drug they'll turn into addicts and end up in the gutter. Teenagers know that
this is a ridiculous exaggeration, and they tend not to take anything they
hear seriously once they realize that the counselor has chosen exaggeration
over truth.

Or socially isolated pontificators who say someone who had 2 DUIs
decades ago as a kid must be an alcoholic.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Viperdoc writes:

Why is it hyperbole or over the top?

Because it is such a severe exaggeration of reality. In trying to
make your point, you exaggerate your argument until it loses all
credibility.


Any response to your drivel doesn't require credibility



Bertie