![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Justin Gombos" wrote in message news:RJDli.7129$CJ4.6231@trndny08... On 2007-07-13, Matt Barrow wrote: I'm not sure I understand how an insurer would even know how many hours a pilot is flying for the current policy year. They ask you (and it's essentially an affirmation under oath...plus they MAY ask for your logs) How often do they collect that information? I would expect them to do that upon establishing or renewing a policy, but mid-term? Typically, on renewal (annually). If you were originally claiming 50 hours a year, and somehow managed to put in 250 hours, you could call your broker and have him update/modify the policy. If you reveal in the middle of a policy year that you have not logged any hours, do the rates increase? Not in the middle of the year, but possibly on annual renewal. If your hours are in the "minimum" category, there's little room to move DOWN. I can see how an insurer would value air time logged in the *past* (which I assume is already factored into the rate quote for the following term). Do pilots update their insurers mid-term to get mid-term rate reductions? Experience. You're way out of your element here and setting yourself up for a thumpin'. Whatever concept I'm missing, feel free to explain it to me like I'm a two year old. I'm a noob. Give me whatever thumpin' I need to understand you. AFAIK, my knee-jerk analysis of it tells me only logged airtime in the past can work to reduce my insurance bill. That's already been explained to you. As for the two year-old noob, you apparently have a hard time grasping the reality of how these things work. Did you read the PDF from Columbia about insurance? I see hours/days in the future as risk, and I'm surprised to hear that an insurance company would not hold the same view. Why don't you call an insurance broker and he will offer you good advice. Since there's a good probability he'll make money, he'll be more than happy to spend hours explaining things to you than most people that have bought car insurance have already figured out at the fundamental level. As mentioned, these points have already been explained. Deal with it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-07-13, Matt Barrow wrote:
Typically, on renewal (annually). If you were originally claiming 50 hours a year, and somehow managed to put in 250 hours, you could call your broker and have him update/modify the policy. So does the pilots estimate of the hours per year they expect to fly affect the premium? Auto insurers often ask how many miles drivers expect to put on in a year, but it never seems to affect the rate, and the brokers often tell me it makes no difference whether my actual milage turns out to be more. These estimates are apparently just used for later aggregate analysis. I can see how an insurer would value air time logged in the *past* (which I assume is already factored into the rate quote for the following term). Do pilots update their insurers mid-term to get mid-term rate reductions? Experience. You're way out of your element here and setting yourself up for a thumpin'. Whatever concept I'm missing, feel free to explain it to me like I'm a two year old. I'm a noob. Give me whatever thumpin' I need to understand you. AFAIK, my knee-jerk analysis of it tells me only logged airtime in the past can work to reduce my insurance bill. That's already been explained to you. Not exactly. Past experience is favorable, yes, I got that; that's intuitive. But the part where *future* air time to be logged after the policy begins counts as favorable experience is apparently the reality I'm still having trouble grasping (it has not been explained well enough here). Suppose someone with 250 hours claims in advance that they will fly 1000+ hours over the course of the upcoming policy year. Would their net rate (not effective hourly rate) be less than a pilot that claims they will fly 150 hours over the policy year? As for the two year-old noob, you apparently have a hard time grasping the reality of how these things work. Did you read the PDF from Columbia about insurance? Yes, I found the information quite useful. In fact, that's what prompted my earlier comment that there is very little competition here (only nine insurers), and thus more incentive for providers overestimate the cost of the risk that's being transferred. Nothing in that PDF countered any of the points I've made, except perhaps the statement that whether a pilot flys on a regular basis is a factor. The PDF does not elaborate on where that line is drawn. I would consider a pilot that flies every weekend to be flying on a regular basis, since half a week is not enough time to forget things. Some pilots go years without flying, and then decide to fly again. So the question is: where do most insurance companies draw the line? I see hours/days in the future as risk, and I'm surprised to hear that an insurance company would not hold the same view. Why don't you call an insurance broker and he will offer you good advice. Since there's a good probability he'll make money, he'll be more than happy to spend hours explaining things to you than most people that have bought car insurance have already figured out at the fundamental level. As mentioned, these points have already been explained. Deal with it. If I've exhausted you, I certainly don't expect you to continue with this thread. Feel free to bail. My questions remain open for anyone with an urge to answer. -- PM instructions: caesar cipher the alpha chars in my addy (key = +3). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 14, 2:56 pm, Justin Gombos
wrote: So does the pilots estimate of the hours per year they expect to fly affect the premium? Auto insurers often ask how many miles drivers I have been a plane onwer for the last 4 years. None of the forms that I had filled out to obtain quotes from several insurance companies/agencies asked me to estimate the hours that I expect to fly. They all wanted to know the same things such as total number of hours, total number of hours in type/model, total number of hours flown the last 12 months, total number of hours flown the last 90 days etc All policies are for the whole year. In 2005, our policy expired in March and we were scheduled to take our accelerated IFR training in May, we were told that having instrument ratings would reduce our premium but we would have to wait until next year for the discount to take effect since the policy could not be adjusted even after only two months. In another year, my husband was only10 or so hours shy of 500hrs when we renewed the policy. I had over 500hrs at that time but the cost was based on the co-insurers with the least experience. Again we were told that there would be a cost reduction after 500hrs but it would not take effect until the next year. Unlike automobile insurance where there are many companies to choose from, there are less than a handful of aviation insurance companies. Their policies are very much similar. Whether you think that the policies make sense or not, you have to accept whatever availalbe. It's apples and oranges when it comes to comparing automobile and aviation insurances. Hai Longworth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Insuring a C310 vs. Piper Seneca | Dave | Owning | 17 | October 27th 04 03:29 PM |
Airports Around Columbia SC | S Ramirez | Piloting | 16 | December 24th 03 12:08 PM |
columbia anyone disciplined? | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 2 | September 15th 03 03:58 AM |
be careful if you fly in Columbia | EDR | Piloting | 0 | August 20th 03 05:43 PM |
Age Wasn't a Cause of the Columbia Disaster | blackfire | Military Aviation | 0 | July 15th 03 01:21 AM |