![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is what a NASA engineer told me too. I spoke to him during an SAE
conference several years ago. NASA was involved in the analization of both the YC-14 and YC-15. During takeoff and landing, symetrical lift is critical. This engine out scenario contributed to McDonnel's "winning" the competition, although there was no production contract. The design requirements changed, and the designs were recompeted with an aircraft large enough to carry an M-1 tank. This led to the C-17. Boeing's entry was a 3 engine variant of the YC-14. Ron "Guybrush Threepwood" wrote in message ... Isn't that a little dangerous in the "one engine off" case? David Powell wrote: it was called the "coda" effect high lift and take off at 100 feet... "Oviedo" wrote in message . .. "Bruce R" wrote in message ... "Troy24" wrote in message ... So where is the exhanust from the engines vented to?? Must be bloody noisy in the cabin too eh?? Bruce R Over the top of the wings -- Gruß Guybrush |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|