![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
... Justin, you are MXing. Everyone here has told you that you aren't going to find a weekend only policy. http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...raft+Insurance Use that search and if you find one let us know. Looking for a weekend-only policy would be similar to asking for 1/3 off because you don't fly it while you sleep, or asking for 97% off because you only fly it 3% of the hours available in a year. The insurance companies are in it for the money. They figure out your likelihood of a claim based on your past. I doubt they will pay an underwriter and actuary to calculate the chances of you having an accident only on a weekend, just because you want to save a few bucks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-07-17, El Maximo wrote:
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... Looking for a weekend-only policy would be similar to asking for 1/3 off because you don't fly it while you sleep, Even the most extreme pilots who are in the air the most are not PIC during their sleep, which means the annual policy /assumes/ this in their figures. For an insurer to quote an hourly rate on the same group, the risk per unit time would increase, saving the insured nothing. So no, it wouldn't even be close to the same thing in the case of weekend pilots getting a policy that accurately reflects their risk. Some motorcycle policies in cold climate areas cover the full year, but the risk assessment expects riders to only ride in spring/summer/fall. Asking for the pro rata share of winter to be knocked off the premium would actually make the net risk much higher than the cost of it. What's interesting is that bikers will sometimes attach a sidecar just for the winter (usually biker cops), and leverage the insurance during the period it wasn't intended. If that activity were to become popular enough, it would have the long term effect of costing those who winterize their bikes. or asking for 97% off because you only fly it 3% of the hours available in a year. If some pilots were managing to use 100% of the available hours while others were using 3%, and the risk assessment did not accurately account for that difference, then you would have a usable analogy in this case. The insurance companies are in it for the money. They figure out your likelihood of a claim based on your past. I doubt they will pay an underwriter and actuary to calculate the chances of you having an accident only on a weekend, just because you want to save a few bucks. Bingo. Exactly. Good point. They have an obligation to the stockholders / owners to maximize profit (rightly so). So it's not in their interest reduce profit margin to needlessly undercut what little competition there is. -- PM instructions: caesar cipher the alpha chars in my addy (key = +3). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Justin Gombos" wrote in message
news:UZbni.6071$225.1718@trndny03... So no, it wouldn't even be close to the same thing in the case of weekend pilots getting a policy that accurately reflects their risk. If you say so. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 17, 11:14 am, "El Maximo" wrote:
The insurance companies are in it for the money. They figure out your likelihood of a claim based on your past. I doubt they will pay an Unlike automobile insurance where both your past and future driving experience are used to determine your premium, all the forms which I had filled for aviation insurance only asked about my past experience. The difference may come from the fact that driving risk increases with amount of driving time. The more mileage you plan to put in a year, the higher your chance of involving in automobile accidents. Whereas in aviavtion, the more flying experience you have, the less chance that you will have an accident. I don't have the time to look for the statistics but I'd bet there are more occurences of automobile accidents caused by other drivers than aviation accidents caused by other pilots. I think that Justin likes to argue for argument sake. I recalled having to endure a life insurance pitch from an insurance man years ago. It's fun to imagine that this unbearable man is now selling aviation policies and has someone like Justin for a client ;-) Hai Longworth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Insuring a C310 vs. Piper Seneca | Dave | Owning | 17 | October 27th 04 03:29 PM |
Airports Around Columbia SC | S Ramirez | Piloting | 16 | December 24th 03 12:08 PM |
columbia anyone disciplined? | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 2 | September 15th 03 03:58 AM |
be careful if you fly in Columbia | EDR | Piloting | 0 | August 20th 03 05:43 PM |
Age Wasn't a Cause of the Columbia Disaster | blackfire | Military Aviation | 0 | July 15th 03 01:21 AM |