A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

VOR approach SMO



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 23rd 07, 10:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
karl gruber[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 396
Default VOR approach SMO

Once inside BEVEY you're good for 680. There is no glideslope and it's "Dive
and Drive." That's why the pros make it in with no trouble, they can read
charts.

Karl

Karl
"Hamish Reid" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"karl gruber" wrote:

I see no problem with the weather 800/3 as you point out. Inside BEVEY
drive
down to 680 outside CULVE, and have 3 miles to descend 505 feet. Any jet
will do that all day long.


So you'd drop below 1120 *outside* CULVE? Even if you were just cutting
things a little fine, the 2.4 miles from CULVE is from the *far end* of
the runway you're landing on... and if you were descending below 1120
just inside BEVEY in IMC, you might be in more trouble than you'd like.

Hamish



  #2  
Old July 24th 07, 12:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 73
Default VOR approach SMO

Right, dive to 1120 and drive to CULVE, then dive to 680.

karl gruber wrote:

Once inside BEVEY you're good for 680. There is no glideslope and it's "Dive
and Drive." That's why the pros make it in with no trouble, they can read
charts.

Karl

  #3  
Old July 24th 07, 01:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default VOR approach SMO

On Jul 23, 4:08 pm, B wrote:
Right, dive to 1120 and drive to CULVE, then dive to 680.


So, the question is still, how does the GulfStream get from CULVE at
1120 down to 0 at the numbers. I was in IMC with gear and flaps down,
power at idle and in a slip and I was still about 3/4 down when I
touched. Does a GulfStream drop faster than a Mooney?

-Robert

  #4  
Old July 24th 07, 01:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Doug Semler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 175
Default VOR approach SMO

On Jul 23, 8:31 pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
On Jul 23, 4:08 pm, B wrote:

Right, dive to 1120 and drive to CULVE, then dive to 680.


So, the question is still, how does the GulfStream get from CULVE at
1120 down to 0 at the numbers. I was in IMC with gear and flaps down,
power at idle and in a slip and I was still about 3/4 down when I
touched. Does a GulfStream drop faster than a Mooney?


I wouldn't be surprised...doesn't NASA use Gulfstreams albiet
modified) to train Shuttle pilots to be able to land the "flying
brick?" g

  #5  
Old July 24th 07, 02:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default VOR approach SMO

On Jul 23, 5:41 pm, Doug Semler wrote:
On Jul 23, 8:31 pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:

On Jul 23, 4:08 pm, B wrote:


Right, dive to 1120 and drive to CULVE, then dive to 680.


So, the question is still, how does the GulfStream get from CULVE at
1120 down to 0 at the numbers. I was in IMC with gear and flaps down,
power at idle and in a slip and I was still about 3/4 down when I
touched. Does a GulfStream drop faster than a Mooney?


I wouldn't be surprised...doesn't NASA use Gulfstreams albiet
modified) to train Shuttle pilots to be able to land the "flying
brick?" g


Yea, with thrust reverses in the descent!

-Robert

  #6  
Old July 24th 07, 02:07 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Doug Semler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 175
Default VOR approach SMO

On Jul 23, 9:03 pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
On Jul 23, 5:41 pm, Doug Semler wrote:

On Jul 23, 8:31 pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
Does a GulfStream drop faster than a Mooney?


I wouldn't be surprised...doesn't NASA use Gulfstreams albiet
modified) to train Shuttle pilots to be able to land the "flying
brick?" g


Yea, with thrust reverses in the descent!


There's your answer... Guy behind you is a former shuttle pilot big
grin

  #7  
Old July 24th 07, 02:47 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
John R. Copeland
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 81
Default VOR approach SMO

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com...

Yea, with thrust reverses in the descent!

-Robert


Reminds me of a story told me by a friend in school for his King Air.
A classmate asked if he could reverse the prop pitch in flight.
The instructor replied: "Yes, you can.
And if you do, you will fall out of the sky like a typewriter."

  #8  
Old July 24th 07, 04:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Doug Semler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 175
Default VOR approach SMO

On Jul 23, 8:31 pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
On Jul 23, 4:08 pm, B wrote:

Right, dive to 1120 and drive to CULVE, then dive to 680.


So, the question is still, how does the GulfStream get from CULVE at
1120 down to 0 at the numbers. I was in IMC with gear and flaps down,
power at idle and in a slip and I was still about 3/4 down when I
touched. Does a GulfStream drop faster than a Mooney?


FWIW, my quick and dirty math shows ~5.5 degree slope from CULVE to
threshold @ 1120. If you keep that slope, you would have broken
through the clouds about 6500 ft from the threshold at 800 (625 agl).
The Gulf's approach speed is something like 120 or 130. Calling it
130, that's a 1300-1400fpm descent rate at that slope. If the gulf
can do that, then they could keep a nice steady path to the threshold
@ 5.5 degrees.

Now if you dive at a 6.5 degree slope at CULVE, you are decreasing
your final angle to 5 degrees while extending your distance to
threshold another 500 ft when breaking out.

Of course, this all assumes that you are actually at 1120 when at
culve g

  #9  
Old July 24th 07, 06:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default VOR approach SMO

On Jul 24, 8:59 am, Doug Semler wrote:
On Jul 23, 8:31 pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:

On Jul 23, 4:08 pm, B wrote:


Right, dive to 1120 and drive to CULVE, then dive to 680.


So, the question is still, how does the GulfStream get from CULVE at
1120 down to 0 at the numbers. I was in IMC with gear and flaps down,
power at idle and in a slip and I was still about 3/4 down when I
touched. Does a GulfStream drop faster than a Mooney?


FWIW, my quick and dirty math shows ~5.5 degree slope from CULVE to
threshold @ 1120. If you keep that slope, you would have broken
through the clouds about 6500 ft from the threshold at 800 (625 agl).
The Gulf's approach speed is something like 120 or 130. Calling it
130, that's a 1300-1400fpm descent rate at that slope. If the gulf
can do that, then they could keep a nice steady path to the threshold
@ 5.5 degrees.

Now if you dive at a 6.5 degree slope at CULVE, you are decreasing
your final angle to 5 degrees while extending your distance to
threshold another 500 ft when breaking out.

Of course, this all assumes that you are actually at 1120 when at
culve g


And that your approach speed and threshold crossing speed are the same
(i,e. that you don't need additional room to slow down).


  #10  
Old July 25th 07, 03:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Doug Semler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 175
Default VOR approach SMO

On Jul 24, 1:59 pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
On Jul 24, 8:59 am, Doug Semler wrote:





On Jul 23, 8:31 pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:


On Jul 23, 4:08 pm, B wrote:


Right, dive to 1120 and drive to CULVE, then dive to 680.


So, the question is still, how does the GulfStream get from CULVE at
1120 down to 0 at the numbers. I was in IMC with gear and flaps down,
power at idle and in a slip and I was still about 3/4 down when I
touched. Does a GulfStream drop faster than a Mooney?


FWIW, my quick and dirty math shows ~5.5 degree slope from CULVE to
threshold @ 1120. If you keep that slope, you would have broken
through the clouds about 6500 ft from the threshold at 800 (625 agl).
The Gulf's approach speed is something like 120 or 130. Calling it
130, that's a 1300-1400fpm descent rate at that slope. If the gulf
can do that, then they could keep a nice steady path to the threshold
@ 5.5 degrees.


Now if you dive at a 6.5 degree slope at CULVE, you are decreasing
your final angle to 5 degrees while extending your distance to
threshold another 500 ft when breaking out.


Of course, this all assumes that you are actually at 1120 when at
culve g


And that your approach speed and threshold crossing speed are the same
(i,e. that you don't need additional room to slow down


Yes, I told you it was quick and dirty (I did it pretty much in my
head. there's *alot* of rounding in there g)

I did a search and can't find any performance characteristics of a
gulf on the web, except an accident report stating the probable cause
of an accident as the pilot's putting the plane in an unstabilized
2500fpm descent profile :-/

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VOR approach SMO Robert M. Gary Piloting 124 August 3rd 07 02:17 AM
first approach in IMC G. Sylvester Instrument Flight Rules 10 July 12th 05 02:14 AM
No FAF on an ILS approach...? John Harper Instrument Flight Rules 7 December 24th 03 03:54 AM
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 45 November 20th 03 05:20 AM
Brief an approach Ditch Instrument Flight Rules 11 October 14th 03 12:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.