![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can cross CULVE at 680 because the chart says "CULVE DME/RADAR MINIMA*
680-1" You can descend to 680 past BEVEY. Look at the chart...........that's how it's read. Karl "Doug Semler" wrote in message ps.com... On Jul 23, 5:07 pm, "pgbnh" wrote: I think all but one of the posters have missed the fact that the MDA is not 1120 but 680. If indeed the vis was 3 miles, then the runway should have been in sight from the MDA of 680 feet about a mile OUTSIDE of Culve. (Remember what you can do once you have the runway in sight????) At which point it's not a particularly big deal to lose 500 feet to land on the numbers. Maybe even crossing Culve at 3-400 feet agl Please, tell me how you read the plate in a way that you can cross CULVE below 1120 when you don't have the airport in sight? Note I am not an IA pilot, but I really want to understand this. My reading of the plate is: Cross CULVE at or above 1120. If you are DME equipped and radar, you can then descend to 680. Otherwise you gotta remain at 1120. If you get to the VOR before seeing the airport, you execute missed. Now if the conditions are 800 overcast 3mi, how can you see the airport before hitting CULVE unless you are below the crossing restriction? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 23, 5:28 pm, "karl gruber" wrote:
You can cross CULVE at 680 because the chart says "CULVE DME/RADAR MINIMA* 680-1" You can descend to 680 past BEVEY. Look at the chart...........that's how it's read. So, iff you have DME and RADAR, the _1120_ in profile view changes to _680_, right? That is a *bit* confusing. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Correct. That's why there's a little * next to the 1120*.
Karl "Doug Semler" wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 23, 5:28 pm, "karl gruber" wrote: You can cross CULVE at 680 because the chart says "CULVE DME/RADAR MINIMA* 680-1" You can descend to 680 past BEVEY. Look at the chart...........that's how it's read. So, iff you have DME and RADAR, the _1120_ in profile view changes to _680_, right? That is a *bit* confusing. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
karl gruber wrote:
Correct. That's why there's a little * next to the 1120*. And, that little "*" (black ball number 1 on Jepp chart) means you can descend to 680 ONCE PASSING CULVE. Karl "Doug Semler" wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 23, 5:28 pm, "karl gruber" wrote: You can cross CULVE at 680 because the chart says "CULVE DME/RADAR MINIMA* 680-1" You can descend to 680 past BEVEY. Look at the chart...........that's how it's read. So, iff you have DME and RADAR, the _1120_ in profile view changes to _680_, right? That is a *bit* confusing. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 23, 5:43 pm, "karl gruber" wrote:
Correct. That's why there's a little * next to the 1120*. Unless they changed the rules of footnoting on me, the only thing the little * next to 1120 tells me is that DME is required when the tower is closed. Presumably to identify CULVE. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Semler wrote:
On Jul 23, 5:43 pm, "karl gruber" wrote: Correct. That's why there's a little * next to the 1120*. Unless they changed the rules of footnoting on me, the only thing the little * next to 1120 tells me is that DME is required when the tower is closed. Presumably to identify CULVE. Correct, but the note is a bit ambiguous. DME is not required when the tower is closed unless you want to identify CULVE and use the lower MDA. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 23, 7:43 pm, B wrote:
Doug Semler wrote: On Jul 23, 5:43 pm, "karl gruber" wrote: Correct. That's why there's a little * next to the 1120*. Unless they changed the rules of footnoting on me, the only thing the little * next to 1120 tells me is that DME is required when the tower is closed. Presumably to identify CULVE. Correct, but the note is a bit ambiguous. DME is not required when the tower is closed unless you want to identify CULVE and use the lower MDA. You know, I kinda figured this; otherwise it would have been a VOR/DME appch, right? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR approach SMO | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 124 | August 3rd 07 02:17 AM |
first approach in IMC | G. Sylvester | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 12th 05 02:14 AM |
No FAF on an ILS approach...? | John Harper | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | December 24th 03 03:54 AM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |
Brief an approach | Ditch | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | October 14th 03 12:10 AM |