A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

VOR approach SMO



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 24th 07, 06:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default VOR approach SMO

On Jul 24, 10:00 am, Roy Smith wrote:

Your original statement that you "touched down about 3/4 down the runway".
That set warning bells off in my head. Were you planning on touching down
that far down the runway,


Pretty much that's what I expected would happen.

or did you just come in too high and fast and
that's when you managed to stop flying?


Of course I came in high and fast. That's really the point of this
thread, that the approach requires you to be high and fast (my minimum
IFR approach speed is 90 knots) and of course I was 1120 about 2 miles
from the end of the runway as required by the approach.

You seemed surprised that the Gulfsteam driver behind you managed to land
on the beginning of the runway.


And I'm still surprised.

I'm guessing he had the approach planned
out far in advance and knew what descent rates he would need and what
configuration it would take to get that.


You keep referring planning. I'm not sure what planning you are
referring to in this context. The fact is that the GulfStream probably
had to have a good 1300 ft/min decent rate (assuming he flew the
approach perfectly). I'm surprised a GulfStream can do that because a
Mooney certainly cannot. I had gear and flaps out with power at idle
and couldn't do anywhere near that.

The point is that is it almost certain that the GulfStream was
familiar with the approach and decided to drop down early. My guess is
that a lot of the jets flying into SMO during low overcast are
dropping down to the MDA before CULVE just because they know its the
only way for them to hit the numbers.


And I'm guessing you didn't,
which is why you ended up touching down 3/4 of the way down the runway.


Well, guesses are what you pay for them.

-Robert, CFII

  #2  
Old July 25th 07, 03:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Steve S[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default VOR approach SMO


"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
ps.com...

You keep referring planning. I'm not sure what planning you are
referring to in this context. The fact is that the GulfStream probably
had to have a good 1300 ft/min decent rate (assuming he flew the
approach perfectly). I'm surprised a GulfStream can do that because a
Mooney certainly cannot. I had gear and flaps out with power at idle
and couldn't do anywhere near that.

The point is that is it almost certain that the GulfStream was
familiar with the approach and decided to drop down early. My guess is
that a lot of the jets flying into SMO during low overcast are
dropping down to the MDA before CULVE just because they know its the
only way for them to hit the numbers.


Or perhaps his spoilers were working? Does your Mooney have them?

  #3  
Old July 30th 07, 06:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.ifr
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 147
Default VOR approach SMO

Robert M. Gary wrote:

Of course I came in high and fast. That's really the point of this
thread, that the approach requires you to be high and fast (my minimum
IFR approach speed is 90 knots) and of course I was 1120 about 2 miles
from the end of the runway as required by the approach.


What's the rationale for the minimum IFR approach speed of 90 knots? A
slower approach speed will get you the required descent angle.

Try flying approaches at different speeds in VMC and see what you get.

DB
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SDF Approach? A Guy Called Tyketto Piloting 9 April 18th 07 01:32 AM
First LPV approach Viperdoc[_4_] Instrument Flight Rules 0 March 5th 07 03:23 AM
ILS or LOC approach? Dan Wegman Instrument Flight Rules 17 May 9th 05 11:41 PM
No FAF on an ILS approach...? John Harper Instrument Flight Rules 7 December 24th 03 03:54 AM
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 45 November 20th 03 05:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.