![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 24, 10:00 am, Roy Smith wrote:
Your original statement that you "touched down about 3/4 down the runway". That set warning bells off in my head. Were you planning on touching down that far down the runway, Pretty much that's what I expected would happen. or did you just come in too high and fast and that's when you managed to stop flying? Of course I came in high and fast. That's really the point of this thread, that the approach requires you to be high and fast (my minimum IFR approach speed is 90 knots) and of course I was 1120 about 2 miles from the end of the runway as required by the approach. You seemed surprised that the Gulfsteam driver behind you managed to land on the beginning of the runway. And I'm still surprised. I'm guessing he had the approach planned out far in advance and knew what descent rates he would need and what configuration it would take to get that. You keep referring planning. I'm not sure what planning you are referring to in this context. The fact is that the GulfStream probably had to have a good 1300 ft/min decent rate (assuming he flew the approach perfectly). I'm surprised a GulfStream can do that because a Mooney certainly cannot. I had gear and flaps out with power at idle and couldn't do anywhere near that. The point is that is it almost certain that the GulfStream was familiar with the approach and decided to drop down early. My guess is that a lot of the jets flying into SMO during low overcast are dropping down to the MDA before CULVE just because they know its the only way for them to hit the numbers. And I'm guessing you didn't, which is why you ended up touching down 3/4 of the way down the runway. Well, guesses are what you pay for them. -Robert, CFII |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ps.com... You keep referring planning. I'm not sure what planning you are referring to in this context. The fact is that the GulfStream probably had to have a good 1300 ft/min decent rate (assuming he flew the approach perfectly). I'm surprised a GulfStream can do that because a Mooney certainly cannot. I had gear and flaps out with power at idle and couldn't do anywhere near that. The point is that is it almost certain that the GulfStream was familiar with the approach and decided to drop down early. My guess is that a lot of the jets flying into SMO during low overcast are dropping down to the MDA before CULVE just because they know its the only way for them to hit the numbers. Or perhaps his spoilers were working? Does your Mooney have them? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
Of course I came in high and fast. That's really the point of this thread, that the approach requires you to be high and fast (my minimum IFR approach speed is 90 knots) and of course I was 1120 about 2 miles from the end of the runway as required by the approach. What's the rationale for the minimum IFR approach speed of 90 knots? A slower approach speed will get you the required descent angle. Try flying approaches at different speeds in VMC and see what you get. DB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SDF Approach? | A Guy Called Tyketto | Piloting | 9 | April 18th 07 01:32 AM |
First LPV approach | Viperdoc[_4_] | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | March 5th 07 03:23 AM |
ILS or LOC approach? | Dan Wegman | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | May 9th 05 11:41 PM |
No FAF on an ILS approach...? | John Harper | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | December 24th 03 03:54 AM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |