Mustang Collision Oshkosh

Big John wrote:

mxsmanic

Probably should have used a better set of words.

You are correct. I should not have called them "losers", I should have
called them "idiots". Landing a P-51 in formation is extremely easy. They
should not have been even allowed to fly aircraft that rare if they
couldn't fly any better than that. I could have done that landing in my
sleep. In fact, I frequently *do*.

In article ,
Mxsmanic wrote:

Big John wrote:

mxsmanic

Probably should have used a better set of words.

You are correct. I should not have called them "losers", I should have
called them "idiots". Landing a P-51 in formation is extremely easy. They
should not have been even allowed to fly aircraft that rare if they
couldn't fly any better than that. I could have done that landing in my
sleep. In fact, I frequently *do*.

This from someone whose only "flight experience" is in a Microsoft
Flight Sim Mk I!

Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article ,
Mxsmanic wrote:

Big John wrote:

mxsmanic

Probably should have used a better set of words.

You are correct. I should not have called them "losers", I should
have called them "idiots". Landing a P-51 in formation is extremely
easy. They should not have been even allowed to fly aircraft that
rare if they couldn't fly any better than that. I could have done
that landing in my sleep. In fact, I frequently *do*.

This from someone whose only "flight experience" is in a Microsoft
Flight Sim Mk I!

Me thinks this is from an imposter - one Mx is bad enough.

Just like in several other posts you can tell the "real troll", from the
"fake troll", especially if sex is mentioned since Mx distains the the mere
thought of sex by his own admission.

"flypaper" wrote in message
...
Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article ,
Mxsmanic wrote:

Big John wrote:

mxsmanic

Probably should have used a better set of words.

You are correct. I should not have called them "losers", I should
have called them "idiots". Landing a P-51 in formation is extremely
easy. They should not have been even allowed to fly aircraft that
rare if they couldn't fly any better than that. I could have done
that landing in my sleep. In fact, I frequently *do*.

This from someone whose only "flight experience" is in a Microsoft
Flight Sim Mk I!

Me thinks this is from an imposter - one Mx is bad enough.

Just like in several other posts you can tell the "real troll", from the
"fake troll", especially if sex is mentioned since Mx distains the the
mere
thought of sex by his own admission.


You are correct, that one one of several by the imposter of the troll.

The truth can also be found in the message headers, which are admittedly
tedious to display in Outlook Express--although there may be an easier way
which I have not yet learned.

Peter